Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
To: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
Cc: fedor@doc.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [rfa/symtab] Move find_pc_section call to lookup_minimal_symbol_by_pc
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 23:22:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <401994EE.9060306@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16409.26976.292424.689823@localhost.redhat.com>

> Andrew Cagney writes:
>  > Hello,
>  > 
>  > Ref: RFA symtab: Fix for PR c++/1267 ("next" and shared libraries)
>  > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2003-07/msg00354.html
>  > 
>  > The change unfortunatly broke IRIX 6.5's host compiler which is using 
>  > mdebugread :-(  That code was looking for a symbol in the absolute 
>  > section "*ABS*" but the PR/1267 change was causing *ABS* symbols to be 
>  > ignored (find_pc_section didn't return an absolute section).
>  > 
>  > Since the underlying problem with PR/1267 was with the frame code 
>  > needing a minimal symbol that was in the same section as the frame's PC, 
>  > and that code [indirectly] calls lookup_minimal_symbol_by_pc, I moved 
>  > the find_pc_section call to that function.
>  > 
>  > Tested on i386 GNU/Linux (dwarf 2) with no regressions.
>  > Tested on PPC NetBSD (stabs) with no regressions.
>  > Tested on IRIX and all the warnings, and many failures, disappeared.
>  > See gdb/1519 for how to exercise the bug.
>  > 
>  > ok?
> 
> ok. Does it still fix shlibs/1237 and shlibs/1280 too? Adam, could you
> check please?

Isn't that covered by the testsuite?  Sigh.

Andrew



  reply	other threads:[~2004-01-29 23:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-01-27 22:23 Andrew Cagney
2004-01-27 22:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-01-29 20:15 ` Elena Zannoni
2004-01-29 23:22   ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2004-01-30  3:30     ` Adam Fedor
2004-01-30  4:53     ` Adam Fedor
2004-02-04 22:25       ` Elena Zannoni
2004-02-09  4:26         ` Adam Fedor
2004-02-09 15:31           ` Elena Zannoni
2004-01-30  3:29   ` Adam Fedor
2004-02-04 22:20     ` Elena Zannoni
2004-02-04 23:06       ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-06 18:59         ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-08  5:17           ` Adam Fedor
2004-02-09 15:35           ` Elena Zannoni
2004-02-09 16:40             ` Andrew Cagney
2004-02-09 17:54               ` Joel Brobecker
2004-02-09 21:58 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-02-10 16:38 ` Adam Fedor
2004-02-16 18:11 ` Elena Zannoni
2004-02-17  4:47   ` Adam Fedor
2004-02-17  5:00     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-17 14:23     ` Elena Zannoni
2004-02-18  3:40       ` Adam Fedor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=401994EE.9060306@gnu.org \
    --to=cagney@gnu.org \
    --cc=ezannoni@redhat.com \
    --cc=fedor@doc.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox