From: Andreas Arnez <arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [testsuite patch] for: [PATCH] [PR corefiles/17808] i386: Fix internal error when prstatus in core file is too big
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 19:27:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vbkf7o19.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54B00160.5000309@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Fri, 09 Jan 2015 16:27:12 +0000")
On Fri, Jan 09 2015, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> Any other comments?
>
> Do we need to do the same in other places? This grep seems to suggest yes:
>
> $ grep assert * | grep sizeof | grep regset
> amd64obsd-tdep.c: gdb_assert (len >= tdep->sizeof_gregset + I387_SIZEOF_FXSAVE);
> amd64-tdep.c: gdb_assert (len == tdep->sizeof_fpregset);
> amd64-tdep.c: gdb_assert (len == tdep->sizeof_fpregset);
> i386obsd-tdep.c: gdb_assert (len >= tdep->sizeof_gregset + I387_SIZEOF_FSAVE);
> i386-tdep.c: gdb_assert (len == tdep->sizeof_gregset);
> i386-tdep.c: gdb_assert (len == tdep->sizeof_gregset);
> i386-tdep.c: gdb_assert (len == tdep->sizeof_fpregset);
> i386-tdep.c: gdb_assert (len == tdep->sizeof_fpregset);
> mips-linux-tdep.c: gdb_assert (len == sizeof (mips_elf_gregset_t));
> mips-linux-tdep.c: gdb_assert (len == sizeof (mips_elf_gregset_t));
> mips-linux-tdep.c: gdb_assert (len == sizeof (mips_elf_fpregset_t));
> mips-linux-tdep.c: gdb_assert (len == sizeof (mips_elf_fpregset_t));
> mips-linux-tdep.c: gdb_assert (len == sizeof (mips64_elf_gregset_t));
> mips-linux-tdep.c: gdb_assert (len == sizeof (mips64_elf_gregset_t));
> mips-linux-tdep.c: gdb_assert (len == sizeof (mips64_elf_fpregset_t));
> mips-linux-tdep.c: gdb_assert (len == sizeof (mips64_elf_fpregset_t));
> mn10300-linux-tdep.c: gdb_assert (len == sizeof (mn10300_elf_gregset_t));
> mn10300-linux-tdep.c: gdb_assert (len == sizeof (mn10300_elf_fpregset_t));
> mn10300-linux-tdep.c: gdb_assert (len == sizeof (mn10300_elf_gregset_t));
Right, these should be handled as well. Once we agree on how to handle
them, I can provide an updated patch.
> On 01/08/2015 04:16 PM, Andreas Arnez wrote:
>> Note that this behavior deviates from the default policy: In general, if
>> some future kernel adds new registers to a register set, then a GDB
>> unaware of this extension would read the known subset and just ignore
>> the unknown bytes.
>
> That's a good point.
>
> get_core_register_section checks the section size already:
>
> get_core_register_section (struct regcache *regcache,
> const struct regset *regset,
> const char *name,
> int min_size,
> int which,
> const char *human_name,
> int required)
> {
> ...
> size = bfd_section_size (core_bfd, section);
> if (size < min_size)
> {
> warning (_("Section `%s' in core file too small."), section_name);
> return;
> }
> ...
>
> Should we remove all those asserts, and make it the
> job of get_core_register_section to warn if the section
> size is bigger than expected? We may need to pass
> the "expected" section size to the callback, in addition
> to the "minimum" size though.
Good point. Or maybe instead of adding the expected size to the
callback we could allow the regset supply functions to pass back their
"recognized" size? For instance:
diff --git a/gdb/i386-tdep.c b/gdb/i386-tdep.c
index 0750506..3ad491d 100644
--- a/gdb/i386-tdep.c
+++ b/gdb/i386-tdep.c
@@ -3720,14 +3720,14 @@ i386_value_to_register (struct frame_info *frame, int regnum,
void
i386_supply_gregset (const struct regset *regset, struct regcache *regcache,
- int regnum, const void *gregs, size_t len)
+ int regnum, const void *gregs, size_t *len)
{
struct gdbarch *gdbarch = get_regcache_arch (regcache);
const struct gdbarch_tdep *tdep = gdbarch_tdep (gdbarch);
const gdb_byte *regs = gregs;
int i;
- gdb_assert (len == tdep->sizeof_gregset);
+ *len = tdep->sizeof_gregset;
for (i = 0; i < tdep->gregset_num_regs; i++)
{
(And then, for symmetry, the regset collect functions could also
indicate how much data they produced, i.e., how large the resulting
register section should be. But I'm not sure whether there is currently
any application for this.)
A more "lazy" approach would be to assume that the "recognized" size
always equals the "minimum" size. Then we could emit the warning like
this:
if (size < min_size)
{
warning (_("Section `%s' in core file too small."), section_name);
return;
}
else if (size != min_size)
warning (_("Section `%s' in core file has unexpected size."),
section_name);
This is certainly less flexible, but might be good enough.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-09 19:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-08 16:16 Andreas Arnez
2015-01-08 16:43 ` [testsuite patch] for: " Jan Kratochvil
2015-01-09 9:47 ` Andreas Arnez
2015-01-09 16:45 ` Pedro Alves
2015-01-09 16:59 ` Mark Kettenis
2015-01-09 17:19 ` Pedro Alves
2015-01-09 19:35 ` Mark Kettenis
2015-01-09 20:11 ` Pedro Alves
2015-01-09 20:30 ` Mark Kettenis
2015-01-12 14:30 ` Andreas Arnez
2015-01-09 19:27 ` Andreas Arnez [this message]
2015-02-05 7:38 ` ping: " Jan Kratochvil
2015-02-05 9:47 ` Pedro Alves
2015-02-14 15:12 ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-02-17 12:56 ` Pedro Alves
2015-02-17 16:56 ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-02-21 14:28 ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil
2015-07-14 8:52 ` ping: " Yao Qi
2015-07-14 18:07 ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-07-15 16:14 ` Yao Qi
2015-07-15 16:58 ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-07-16 14:15 ` Yao Qi
2015-07-16 14:37 ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-07-16 15:35 ` Yao Qi
2015-07-16 16:10 ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87vbkf7o19.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com \
--to=arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox