Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>,  Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>,
	 gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
	 Andreas Arnez <arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: ping: [testsuite patch] for: [PATCH] [PR corefiles/17808] i386: Fix internal error when prstatus in core file is too big
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 16:14:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86fv4pjt4m.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150714180748.GA13461@host1.jankratochvil.net> (Jan	Kratochvil's message of "Tue, 14 Jul 2015 20:07:48 +0200")

Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:

> (1) The testcase did not really test if elf64-i386 is supported by GDB (BFD).
> That was OK for a Fedora testcase but I forgot about it when submitting it
> upstream.
>
> I haven't really verified if the GNU target is elf64-little but it seems so,
> no other one seems suitable from:
> 	elf32-x86-64
> 	elf64-big
> 	elf64-k1om
> 	elf64-l1om
> 	elf64-little
> 	elf64-x86-64
> 	pei-x86-64

Hi Jan,
Why can't we use istarget here?  I thought we still check
istarget "x86_64-*-*", no?

>
> (2) The output of the "core-file" command itself can be arbitrary as the
> elf64-i386 file with x86_64 registers is really broken; but that does not
> matter much, important is the following test whether core file memory is
> readable.

"that does not matter much" mean if internal error isn't triggered, any
output is acceptable, right?  and the purpose of following test "x/i $address"
is to verify this (internal error not triggered)?

Bug 17808 describes that GDB gets internal error when it loads in
i386-biarch-core.core.

> 	./configure --enable-64-bit-bfd
> 	(gdb) core-file /home/jkratoch/redhat/gdb-test-build32-plus64/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-biarch-core.core^M
> 	warning: Couldn't find general-purpose registers in core file.^M
> 	Failed to read a valid object file image from memory.^M
> 	warning: Couldn't find general-purpose registers in core file.^M
> 	#0  <unavailable> in ?? ()^M
> 	(gdb) FAIL: gdb.arch/i386-biarch-core.exp: core-file
> 	x/i 0x400078^M
> 	   0x400078:    hlt    ^M
> 	(gdb) PASS: gdb.arch/i386-biarch-core.exp: .text is readable
>


>  # Wrongly built GDB complains by:
>  # "..." is not a core dump: File format not recognized
>  # As the provided test core has 64bit PRSTATUS i386 built GDB cannot parse it.
>  # This is just a problem of the test case, real-world elf64-i386 file will have
>  # 32bit PRSTATUS.  One cannot prepare elf64-i386 core file from elf32-i386 by
>  # objcopy as it corrupts the core file beyond all recognition.

As you said, the output of command "core-file" doesn't matter much, we
need to update the comments here.

> -gdb_test "core-file ${corefile}" "\r\nwarning: Unexpected size of section `\\.reg/6901' in core file\\.\r\n.*Core was generated by `\[^\r\n\]*'\\.\r\nProgram terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault\\.\r\n.*" "core-file"
> +gdb_test "core-file ${corefile}" ".*" "core-file"

>  
>  gdb_test "x/i $address" "\r\n\[ \t\]*$address:\[ \t\]*hlt\[ \t\]*" ".text is readable"

We also need comment here to explain the purpose this "x/i $address" test.

-- 
Yao (齐尧)


  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-15 16:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-08 16:16 Andreas Arnez
2015-01-08 16:43 ` [testsuite patch] for: " Jan Kratochvil
2015-01-09  9:47   ` Andreas Arnez
2015-01-09 16:45     ` Pedro Alves
2015-01-09 16:59       ` Mark Kettenis
2015-01-09 17:19         ` Pedro Alves
2015-01-09 19:35           ` Mark Kettenis
2015-01-09 20:11             ` Pedro Alves
2015-01-09 20:30               ` Mark Kettenis
2015-01-12 14:30                 ` Andreas Arnez
2015-01-09 19:27       ` Andreas Arnez
2015-02-05  7:38   ` ping: " Jan Kratochvil
2015-02-05  9:47     ` Pedro Alves
2015-02-14 15:12       ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-02-17 12:56         ` Pedro Alves
2015-02-17 16:56           ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-02-21 14:28             ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil
2015-07-14  8:52             ` ping: " Yao Qi
2015-07-14 18:07               ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-07-15 16:14                 ` Yao Qi [this message]
2015-07-15 16:58                   ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-07-16 14:15                     ` Yao Qi
2015-07-16 14:37                       ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-07-16 15:35                         ` Yao Qi
2015-07-16 16:10                           ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86fv4pjt4m.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
    --cc=arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox