From: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
Andreas Arnez <arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: ping: [testsuite patch] for: [PATCH] [PR corefiles/17808] i386: Fix internal error when prstatus in core file is too big
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 16:14:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86fv4pjt4m.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150714180748.GA13461@host1.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Tue, 14 Jul 2015 20:07:48 +0200")
Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:
> (1) The testcase did not really test if elf64-i386 is supported by GDB (BFD).
> That was OK for a Fedora testcase but I forgot about it when submitting it
> upstream.
>
> I haven't really verified if the GNU target is elf64-little but it seems so,
> no other one seems suitable from:
> elf32-x86-64
> elf64-big
> elf64-k1om
> elf64-l1om
> elf64-little
> elf64-x86-64
> pei-x86-64
Hi Jan,
Why can't we use istarget here? I thought we still check
istarget "x86_64-*-*", no?
>
> (2) The output of the "core-file" command itself can be arbitrary as the
> elf64-i386 file with x86_64 registers is really broken; but that does not
> matter much, important is the following test whether core file memory is
> readable.
"that does not matter much" mean if internal error isn't triggered, any
output is acceptable, right? and the purpose of following test "x/i $address"
is to verify this (internal error not triggered)?
Bug 17808 describes that GDB gets internal error when it loads in
i386-biarch-core.core.
> ./configure --enable-64-bit-bfd
> (gdb) core-file /home/jkratoch/redhat/gdb-test-build32-plus64/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-biarch-core.core^M
> warning: Couldn't find general-purpose registers in core file.^M
> Failed to read a valid object file image from memory.^M
> warning: Couldn't find general-purpose registers in core file.^M
> #0 <unavailable> in ?? ()^M
> (gdb) FAIL: gdb.arch/i386-biarch-core.exp: core-file
> x/i 0x400078^M
> 0x400078: hlt ^M
> (gdb) PASS: gdb.arch/i386-biarch-core.exp: .text is readable
>
> # Wrongly built GDB complains by:
> # "..." is not a core dump: File format not recognized
> # As the provided test core has 64bit PRSTATUS i386 built GDB cannot parse it.
> # This is just a problem of the test case, real-world elf64-i386 file will have
> # 32bit PRSTATUS. One cannot prepare elf64-i386 core file from elf32-i386 by
> # objcopy as it corrupts the core file beyond all recognition.
As you said, the output of command "core-file" doesn't matter much, we
need to update the comments here.
> -gdb_test "core-file ${corefile}" "\r\nwarning: Unexpected size of section `\\.reg/6901' in core file\\.\r\n.*Core was generated by `\[^\r\n\]*'\\.\r\nProgram terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault\\.\r\n.*" "core-file"
> +gdb_test "core-file ${corefile}" ".*" "core-file"
>
> gdb_test "x/i $address" "\r\n\[ \t\]*$address:\[ \t\]*hlt\[ \t\]*" ".text is readable"
We also need comment here to explain the purpose this "x/i $address" test.
--
Yao (齐尧)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-15 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-08 16:16 Andreas Arnez
2015-01-08 16:43 ` [testsuite patch] for: " Jan Kratochvil
2015-01-09 9:47 ` Andreas Arnez
2015-01-09 16:45 ` Pedro Alves
2015-01-09 16:59 ` Mark Kettenis
2015-01-09 17:19 ` Pedro Alves
2015-01-09 19:35 ` Mark Kettenis
2015-01-09 20:11 ` Pedro Alves
2015-01-09 20:30 ` Mark Kettenis
2015-01-12 14:30 ` Andreas Arnez
2015-01-09 19:27 ` Andreas Arnez
2015-02-05 7:38 ` ping: " Jan Kratochvil
2015-02-05 9:47 ` Pedro Alves
2015-02-14 15:12 ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-02-17 12:56 ` Pedro Alves
2015-02-17 16:56 ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-02-21 14:28 ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil
2015-07-14 8:52 ` ping: " Yao Qi
2015-07-14 18:07 ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-07-15 16:14 ` Yao Qi [this message]
2015-07-15 16:58 ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-07-16 14:15 ` Yao Qi
2015-07-16 14:37 ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-07-16 15:35 ` Yao Qi
2015-07-16 16:10 ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86fv4pjt4m.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
--cc=arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox