From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Andreas Arnez <arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [testsuite patch] for: [PATCH] [PR corefiles/17808] i386: Fix internal error when prstatus in core file is too big
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 16:45:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B00160.5000309@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zj9s70bh.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com>
> Any other comments?
Do we need to do the same in other places? This grep seems to suggest yes:
$ grep assert * | grep sizeof | grep regset
amd64obsd-tdep.c: gdb_assert (len >= tdep->sizeof_gregset + I387_SIZEOF_FXSAVE);
amd64-tdep.c: gdb_assert (len == tdep->sizeof_fpregset);
amd64-tdep.c: gdb_assert (len == tdep->sizeof_fpregset);
i386obsd-tdep.c: gdb_assert (len >= tdep->sizeof_gregset + I387_SIZEOF_FSAVE);
i386-tdep.c: gdb_assert (len == tdep->sizeof_gregset);
i386-tdep.c: gdb_assert (len == tdep->sizeof_gregset);
i386-tdep.c: gdb_assert (len == tdep->sizeof_fpregset);
i386-tdep.c: gdb_assert (len == tdep->sizeof_fpregset);
mips-linux-tdep.c: gdb_assert (len == sizeof (mips_elf_gregset_t));
mips-linux-tdep.c: gdb_assert (len == sizeof (mips_elf_gregset_t));
mips-linux-tdep.c: gdb_assert (len == sizeof (mips_elf_fpregset_t));
mips-linux-tdep.c: gdb_assert (len == sizeof (mips_elf_fpregset_t));
mips-linux-tdep.c: gdb_assert (len == sizeof (mips64_elf_gregset_t));
mips-linux-tdep.c: gdb_assert (len == sizeof (mips64_elf_gregset_t));
mips-linux-tdep.c: gdb_assert (len == sizeof (mips64_elf_fpregset_t));
mips-linux-tdep.c: gdb_assert (len == sizeof (mips64_elf_fpregset_t));
mn10300-linux-tdep.c: gdb_assert (len == sizeof (mn10300_elf_gregset_t));
mn10300-linux-tdep.c: gdb_assert (len == sizeof (mn10300_elf_fpregset_t));
mn10300-linux-tdep.c: gdb_assert (len == sizeof (mn10300_elf_gregset_t));
On 01/08/2015 04:16 PM, Andreas Arnez wrote:
> Note that this behavior deviates from the default policy: In general, if
> some future kernel adds new registers to a register set, then a GDB
> unaware of this extension would read the known subset and just ignore
> the unknown bytes.
That's a good point.
get_core_register_section checks the section size already:
get_core_register_section (struct regcache *regcache,
const struct regset *regset,
const char *name,
int min_size,
int which,
const char *human_name,
int required)
{
...
size = bfd_section_size (core_bfd, section);
if (size < min_size)
{
warning (_("Section `%s' in core file too small."), section_name);
return;
}
...
Should we remove all those asserts, and make it the
job of get_core_register_section to warn if the section
size is bigger than expected? We may need to pass
the "expected" section size to the callback, in addition
to the "minimum" size though.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-09 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-08 16:16 Andreas Arnez
2015-01-08 16:43 ` [testsuite patch] for: " Jan Kratochvil
2015-01-09 9:47 ` Andreas Arnez
2015-01-09 16:45 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2015-01-09 16:59 ` Mark Kettenis
2015-01-09 17:19 ` Pedro Alves
2015-01-09 19:35 ` Mark Kettenis
2015-01-09 20:11 ` Pedro Alves
2015-01-09 20:30 ` Mark Kettenis
2015-01-12 14:30 ` Andreas Arnez
2015-01-09 19:27 ` Andreas Arnez
2015-02-05 7:38 ` ping: " Jan Kratochvil
2015-02-05 9:47 ` Pedro Alves
2015-02-14 15:12 ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-02-17 12:56 ` Pedro Alves
2015-02-17 16:56 ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-02-21 14:28 ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil
2015-07-14 8:52 ` ping: " Yao Qi
2015-07-14 18:07 ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-07-15 16:14 ` Yao Qi
2015-07-15 16:58 ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-07-16 14:15 ` Yao Qi
2015-07-16 14:37 ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-07-16 15:35 ` Yao Qi
2015-07-16 16:10 ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54B00160.5000309@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox