* Re: [pushed] [gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.dwarf2/forward-spec.exp with read1
2023-07-15 8:46 ` Andreas Schwab
@ 2023-07-15 15:06 ` Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches @ 2023-07-15 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andreas Schwab, Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches; +Cc: Tom Tromey
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1523 bytes --]
On 7/15/23 10:46, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Jul 15 2023, Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/forward-spec.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/forward-spec.exp
>> index ac7d16b09b8..f4512cf9b8c 100644
>> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/forward-spec.exp
>> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/forward-spec.exp
>> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ if {[prepare_for_testing "failed to prepare" ${testfile} \
>>
>> set in_v 0
>> gdb_test_multiple "maint print objfiles" "v has a parent" {
>> - -re "^ *\\\[\[0-9\]\\\] *..cooked_index_entry\[^\r\n\]*" {
>> + -re "^ *\\\[\[0-9\]\\\] *\\(\\(cooked_index_entry\[^\r\n\]*" {
>
> A match that ends with an empty element doesn't make much sense. I
> guess this should rather be
>
> -re "^ *\\\[\[0-9\]\\\] *..cooked_index_entry\[^\r\n\]*\[\r\n\]" {
>
> to avoid matching an incomplete line.
>
>> set in_v 0
>> exp_continue
>> }
>> @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ gdb_test_multiple "maint print objfiles" "v has a parent" {
>> set in_v 1
>> exp_continue
>> }
>> - -re "^ *parent: *..cooked_index_entry .. (0|$hex)." {
>> + -re "^ *parent: *\\(\\(cooked_index_entry \\*\\) (0|$hex)\\)" {
>
> I think this just needs to be anchored on EOL as well.
>
Agreed, anchoring can be improved, but I'd rather use the style that can
be used in combination with -wrap, which only lookahead-matches the EOL,
but doesn't consume it. This plays well with "-wrap", and all the
implicit patterns added by gdb_test_multiple.
Thanks,
- Tom
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-gdb-testsuite-Improve-matching-in-gdb.dwarf2-forward.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2146 bytes --]
From a3f50dcb9b7dca39546781ebf0ee6b0061f1098e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2023 16:52:05 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [gdb/testsuite] Improve matching in
gdb.dwarf2/forward-spec.exp
Improve matching in test-case in gdb.dwarf2/forward-spec.exp:
- use -wrap rather than an explicit "$gdb_prompt " , which misses
the $ anchor at the end
- use line-by-line matching, consuming the start-of-line \r\n, and
lookahead-matching the end-of-line \r\n
- always produce a pass/fail by using a gdb_assert in the -wrap clause
Tested on x86_64-linux.
---
gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/forward-spec.exp | 26 +++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/forward-spec.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/forward-spec.exp
index f4512cf9b8c..e252cbd5890 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/forward-spec.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/forward-spec.exp
@@ -72,31 +72,31 @@ if {[prepare_for_testing "failed to prepare" ${testfile} \
return -1
}
+set ok 0
set in_v 0
-gdb_test_multiple "maint print objfiles" "v has a parent" {
- -re "^ *\\\[\[0-9\]\\\] *\\(\\(cooked_index_entry\[^\r\n\]*" {
+set cmd "maint print objfiles"
+gdb_test_multiple $cmd "v has a parent" {
+ -re "^${cmd}(?=\r\n)" {
+ exp_continue
+ }
+ -re "^\r\n *\\\[$decimal\\\] *\\(\\(cooked_index_entry\[^\r\n\]*(?=\r\n)" {
set in_v 0
exp_continue
}
- -re "^ *name: *v\[\r\n\]*" {
+ -re "^\r\n *name: *v(?=\r\n)" {
set in_v 1
exp_continue
}
- -re "^ *parent: *\\(\\(cooked_index_entry \\*\\) (0|$hex)\\)" {
+ -re "^\r\n *parent: *\\(\\(cooked_index_entry \\*\\) $hex\\)\[^\r\n\]*(?=\r\n)" {
if {$in_v} {
- if {$expect_out(1,string) == "0"} {
- fail $gdb_test_name
- } else {
- pass $gdb_test_name
- }
- set in_v 0
+ set ok 1
}
exp_continue
}
- -re "^\[^\r\n\]*\[\r\n\]+" {
+ -re "^\r\n\[^\r\n\]*(?=\r\n)" {
exp_continue
}
- -re "$gdb_prompt " {
- # Done.
+ -re -wrap "" {
+ gdb_assert $ok $gdb_test_name
}
}
base-commit: 6c1e84f5c6f36263998ef1934bf3132c8cebe75e
--
2.35.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread