From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
To: Sergio Lopez <slp@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Enable the user to dump all memory regions
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 16:08:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r2simlmd.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171128132148.31802-1-slp@redhat.com> (Sergio Lopez's message of "Tue, 28 Nov 2017 14:21:44 +0100")
On Tuesday, November 28 2017, Sergio Lopez wrote:
> GDB versions prior to df8411da087dc05481926f4c4a82deabc5bc3859
> unconditionally included all memory regions in the core dump.
>
> After that change, while is still possible to ask GDB to ignore
> /proc/PID/coredump_filter using the 'set use-coredump-filter' command,
> there's no way to request it to dump regions marked with the VM_DONTDUMP
> flag ("dd" in /proc/PID/smaps").
>
> This patch series implement the new 'set honor-dontdump-flag' command
> for GDB, and the "-a" argument for gcore, allowing the user to mimic the
> behavior of previous GDB versions.
Thanks for the patch, Sergio.
Overall I agree with the approach, but I've made a few comments here and
there about things I think should be addressed. The most important of
them is the command name.
I would really like to see a test for this. We already carry a testcase
for the use-coredump-filter command (see gdb.base/coredump-filter.exp),
so I think you can just extend it to test this specific feature.
Thanks,
> Sergio Lopez (4):
> Implement 'set honor-dontdump-flag' command
> Document new 'set honor-dontdump-flag' command
> Add "-a" argument to gcore.in
> Document the new "-a" argument for gcore
>
> gdb/ChangeLog | 10 ++++++++++
> gdb/doc/ChangeLog | 9 +++++++++
> gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
> gdb/gcore.in | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
> gdb/linux-tdep.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
> 5 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.14.3
--
Sergio
GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
http://sergiodj.net/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-28 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-28 13:22 Sergio Lopez
2017-11-28 13:22 ` [PATCH 1/4] Implement 'set honor-dontdump-flag' command Sergio Lopez
2017-11-28 15:06 ` Sergio Lopez
2017-11-28 15:42 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-28 16:21 ` Pedro Alves
2017-11-28 16:36 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-29 10:59 ` Sergio Lopez
2017-11-29 19:39 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-29 20:02 ` Sergio Lopez
2017-11-29 20:22 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-28 13:22 ` [PATCH 3/4] Add "-a" argument to gcore.in Sergio Lopez
2017-11-28 15:57 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-28 13:22 ` [PATCH 2/4] Document new 'set honor-dontdump-flag' command Sergio Lopez
2017-11-28 15:51 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-28 16:32 ` Pedro Alves
2017-11-28 16:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-11-28 13:22 ` [PATCH 4/4] Document the new "-a" argument for gcore Sergio Lopez
2017-11-28 15:54 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2017-11-28 16:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-11-28 18:37 ` John Baldwin
2017-11-28 16:08 ` Sergio Durigan Junior [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r2simlmd.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=sergiodj@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=slp@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox