Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>,  GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make '{putchar,fputc}_unfiltered' use 'fputs_unfiltered'
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 05:53:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lfowwknr.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200221035717.GA21588@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of	"Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:57:17 +0400")

On Thursday, February 20 2020, Joel Brobecker wrote:

> Hi Sergio and Tom,

Hey Joel,

> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 04:04:05PM -0500, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>> On Thursday, February 20 2020, Tom Tromey wrote:
>> 
>> >>>>>> "Sergio" == Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com> writes:
>> >
>> > Sergio> gdb/ChangeLog:
>> > Sergio> 2020-02-20  Sergio Durigan Junior  <sergiodj@redhat.com>
>> > Sergio> 	    Tom Tromey  <tom@tromey.com>
>> > Sergio> 	* utils.c (fputs_maybe_filtered): Call 'stream->puts' instead
>> > Sergio> 	of 'fputc_unfiltered'.
>> > Sergio> 	(putchar_unfiltered): Call 'fputc_unfiltered'.
>> > Sergio> 	(fputc_unfiltered): Call 'fputs_unfiltered'.
>> >
>> > Looks good to me.  Thanks for doing this.
>> 
>> Thanks, pushed.
>> 
>> 3f702acd7d562d3a33c59d6398ae74058438d2c7
>
> I think the commit that Sergio incriminated is also in gdb-9-branch.
> Do you confirm?

Yes, the bug also happens in gdb-9-branch.

> If yes, what about creating a GDB PR, and backporting this change
> to the gdb-9-branch (all changes after the .1 must have a PR)?

I can do that.  Just not right now; I need to be in my bed sleeping 30
minutes ago ;-).

> The change looks relatively safe to me, but maybe it's not as simple
> as we might think, especially since this section of the code _is_ quite
> central...

Yeah, this code is quite messy, and even though the change is somewhat
"self-contained".  What if we wait a few days/weeks before I open the PR
and do the backport?  Due to this code being quite central as you said,
I think it should not take long for complaints to start coming our way,
assuming there is a bug to be found.

Thanks,

-- 
Sergio
GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF  31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
http://sergiodj.net/


  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-21  5:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-20  4:12 Sergio Durigan Junior
2020-02-20 19:59 ` Tom Tromey
2020-02-20 21:04   ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2020-02-21  3:57     ` Joel Brobecker
2020-02-21  5:53       ` Sergio Durigan Junior [this message]
2020-02-21 10:13         ` Joel Brobecker
2020-02-21 18:31           ` Sergio Durigan Junior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87lfowwknr.fsf@redhat.com \
    --to=sergiodj@redhat.com \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=tom@tromey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox