Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>,  gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Sort #includes in gdb
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:46:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d0nsye46.fsf@tromey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190127045818.GA15682@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of	"Sun, 27 Jan 2019 08:58:18 +0400")

>>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> writes:

Joel> It might be FUD on my part, but with C & C++, I've always been very
Joel> nervous about changing the order of #include-s. This is because some
Joel> headers sometimes define the same macros with different values, and
Joel> so order can make a difference for those (without really knowing
Joel> which is more correct, if any, and whether we are in fact getting
Joel> the one that we should). And of course, this is all highly platform-
Joel> dependent.

Yeah, it's a concern; though I already pushed a series that fixes the
fallout from the first draft of this series.  Basically it was some
minor latent bugs.  I'll answer a bit more in reply to Pedro's note.

Joel> I really like, however, the idea of overcoming that fear, and
Joel> evaluate in practice what the real impact of order is. But since
Joel> we are getting close to 8.3 branching, could we hold the actual
Joel> puth until after the 8.3 branch is created?

Definitely.

Tom


  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-15 20:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-26 15:40 Tom Tromey
2019-01-27  4:58 ` Joel Brobecker
2019-02-15 20:46   ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2019-01-28 19:08 ` Pedro Alves
2019-01-28 22:31   ` Matt Rice
2019-02-15 20:55   ` Tom Tromey
2019-03-15 23:13     ` Tom Tromey
2019-03-20 17:42       ` Pedro Alves
2019-03-29 20:52         ` Tom Tromey
2019-03-29 21:05           ` Simon Marchi
2019-03-30 18:35             ` Tom Tromey
2019-04-03 18:58               ` Pedro Alves
2019-04-03 19:29                 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-04-03 20:34                 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-04-04  2:47                   ` Tom Tromey
2019-04-04  3:40                     ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-04-03 19:00             ` Pedro Alves
2019-04-03 20:11               ` Tom Tromey
2019-04-03 21:00                 ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87d0nsye46.fsf@tromey.com \
    --to=tom@tromey.com \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox