From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] bitpos expansion summary reloaded
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 20:18:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a9vb8vzw.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121024185503.GA7794@host2.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Wed, 24 Oct 2012 20:55:03 +0200")
>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:
Jan> To restate the perfection precondition reason - it was required
Jan> before it has been found out for the really right solution we need
Jan> to do full (2) anyway. Trying to automatically find all
Jan> TYPE_LENGTH-derived values truncations would be impossible anymore
Jan> after checking-in partial (1) and without the (2) fix.
I don't think I follow. It seems to me that the patches in (1) are a
subset of those required for (2).
Jan> I think (2) - fixing -Wconversion should be done for GDB. With GDB
Jan> there only always remains a question what is a priority of this
Jan> task.
Yeah. I find this difficult to prioritize.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-24 20:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-27 13:33 Siddhesh Poyarekar
2012-09-28 11:20 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-09-28 11:40 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2012-09-28 12:06 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-09-28 12:19 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2012-09-29 17:39 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-09-29 18:12 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-09-30 6:52 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-10-01 5:21 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2012-10-01 6:14 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-10-03 13:12 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2012-10-03 18:38 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-10-04 7:20 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2012-10-03 19:56 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-10-04 7:13 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-10-21 7:36 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2012-10-22 20:45 ` Tom Tromey
2012-10-23 1:34 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-10-23 1:58 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-10-23 2:29 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2012-10-23 2:37 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-10-23 2:38 ` Tom Tromey
2012-10-23 19:11 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-10-24 18:33 ` Tom Tromey
2012-10-24 18:55 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-10-24 20:18 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2012-10-25 15:54 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-10-25 16:52 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2012-11-06 20:01 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-11-07 13:48 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-11-13 19:46 ` Tom Tromey
2012-11-13 19:55 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-11-01 15:24 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-11-01 16:56 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a9vb8vzw.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
--to=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=siddhesh@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox