From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][gdb/testsuite] Don't abort testrun for invalid command in test-case
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 16:31:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7d7ce523-b58c-a77d-15be-8091feb6389a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200611143522.GA19667@delia>
On 6/11/20 3:35 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Say we add a call to foobar at the end of a test-case, and run the
> test-suite. We'll run into a dejagnu error:
> ...
> ERROR: (DejaGnu) proc "foobar" does not exist.
> ...
> and the test-suite run is aborted.
>
> It's reasonable that the test-case is aborted, but it's not reasonable that
> the testsuite run is aborted.
>
> Problems in one test-case should not leak into other test-cases, and they
> generally don't. The exception is the "invalid command name" problem due to
> an override of ::unknown in dejagnu's framework.exp.
>
> Fix this by limiting the scope of dejagnu's ::unknown override.
>
> Tested on x86_64-linux.
>
> Any comments?
We should ask the DejaGnu folks to make the exiting on error
optional, so that in a future version we can drop the hack.
What about, say, an error due to calling a tcl proc with the wrong
arguments? "unknown" isn't called for that. Any idea how to
catch those?
> +# Save the unknown proc defined by dejagnu.
> +rename ::unknown ::dejagnu_unknown
> +
> +# Override the unknown proc with a gdb-local version.
> +proc unknown { args } {
> + set script [info script]
> +
> + set script [file dirname $script]
> + set subdir3 [file tail $script]
> +
> + set script [file dirname $script]
> + set subdir2 [file tail $script]
> +
> + set script [file dirname $script]
> + set subdir1 [file tail $script]
> +
> + if { $subdir1 == "gdb"
> + && $subdir2 == "testsuite"
> + && [regexp {^gdb[.]} $subdir3] } {
> + # If we're executing a gdb test-case, skip dejagnu_unknown to prevent
> + # it from exiting and aborting the entire test run.
> + return [uplevel 1 ::tcl_unknown $args]
> + }
> +
I'd think it would be cleaner to override unknown in gdb_init,
and restore in gdb_finish. No need for filename matching that way.
Like below. Any reason you didn't go for this instead?
From dc4d41908280b26224dc190ff9e03a07b7357b2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 16:11:32 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] unknown
---
gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp b/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
index 9a0620a2bf1..312ff1fb366 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
@@ -5193,6 +5193,15 @@ proc gdb_init { test_file_name } {
global gdb_instances
set gdb_instances 0
+ # Skip dejagnu_unknown while running a testcase to prevent it from
+ # exiting and aborting the entire test run. Save the unknown proc
+ # defined by DejaGnu, and override the unknown proc with a
+ # gdb-local version.
+ rename ::unknown ::dejagnu_unknown
+ proc unknown { args } {
+ return [uplevel 1 ::tcl_unknown $args]
+ }
+
return [default_gdb_init $test_file_name]
}
@@ -5201,6 +5210,10 @@ proc gdb_finish { } {
global gdb_prompt
global cleanfiles
+ # Restore DejaGnu's 'unknown' version.
+ rename ::unknown ""
+ rename ::dejagnu_unknown ::unknown
+
# Exit first, so that the files are no longer in use.
gdb_exit
--
2.14.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-11 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-11 14:35 Tom de Vries
2020-06-11 15:31 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2020-06-11 16:25 ` Tom de Vries
2020-06-11 16:56 ` Pedro Alves
2020-06-11 22:55 ` Tom de Vries
2020-06-16 12:47 ` Pedro Alves
2020-06-17 14:14 ` Tom de Vries
2020-06-17 14:19 ` Pedro Alves
2020-06-18 10:16 ` [PATCH][gdb/testsuite] Move code from gdb_init to default_gdb_init Tom de Vries
2020-06-18 10:56 ` Pedro Alves
2020-06-12 7:47 ` [PATCH][gdb/testsuite] Don't abort testrun for invalid command in test-case Tom de Vries
2020-06-12 8:37 ` Tom de Vries
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7d7ce523-b58c-a77d-15be-8091feb6389a@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tdevries@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox