From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][gdb/testsuite] Don't abort testrun for invalid command in test-case
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 15:19:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <605f6d30-4e18-cebc-517c-5a070e477823@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <80251b07-73db-1ca0-7ab6-67285cb6b1d7@suse.de>
On 6/17/20 3:14 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 6/16/20 2:47 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> On 6/11/20 11:55 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
>>
>>> Hmm, what is the distinction between gdb_init and default_gdb_init?
>>>
>>> All the other uses in gdb.exp of pattern foo/default_foo have an
>>> implementation:
>>> ...
>>> proc foo {} {
>>> [default_foo]
>>> }
>>> ...
>>> but gdb_init is much more than that. Why is that different?
>>>
>>
>> I don't know. I guess it shouldn't. I guess people (including me) added to
>> gdb_init over time without realizing they were breaking the pattern. Maybe nobody
>> notices it because whatever is overriding gdb_init renames the original one and
>> then calls it.
>
> Hmm, thanks for the explanation. I feel we need to improve this
> situation somehow, but I'm not sure yet how.
Move stuff in gdb_init to default_gdb_init, and add a comment to these
functions to not add stuff in there? That seems like the obvious.
I'm not sure why we have that pattern in the first place though, given
that you can rename/override functions in tcl anyhow. This all predates me.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-17 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-11 14:35 Tom de Vries
2020-06-11 15:31 ` Pedro Alves
2020-06-11 16:25 ` Tom de Vries
2020-06-11 16:56 ` Pedro Alves
2020-06-11 22:55 ` Tom de Vries
2020-06-16 12:47 ` Pedro Alves
2020-06-17 14:14 ` Tom de Vries
2020-06-17 14:19 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2020-06-18 10:16 ` [PATCH][gdb/testsuite] Move code from gdb_init to default_gdb_init Tom de Vries
2020-06-18 10:56 ` Pedro Alves
2020-06-12 7:47 ` [PATCH][gdb/testsuite] Don't abort testrun for invalid command in test-case Tom de Vries
2020-06-12 8:37 ` Tom de Vries
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=605f6d30-4e18-cebc-517c-5a070e477823@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tdevries@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox