From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][gdb/testsuite] Don't abort testrun for invalid command in test-case
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 18:25:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <18e36963-4f04-f871-33fb-89a5d1683bbd@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7d7ce523-b58c-a77d-15be-8091feb6389a@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3853 bytes --]
On 11-06-2020 17:31, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 6/11/20 3:35 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Say we add a call to foobar at the end of a test-case, and run the
>> test-suite. We'll run into a dejagnu error:
>> ...
>> ERROR: (DejaGnu) proc "foobar" does not exist.
>> ...
>> and the test-suite run is aborted.
>>
>> It's reasonable that the test-case is aborted, but it's not reasonable that
>> the testsuite run is aborted.
>>
>> Problems in one test-case should not leak into other test-cases, and they
>> generally don't. The exception is the "invalid command name" problem due to
>> an override of ::unknown in dejagnu's framework.exp.
>>
>> Fix this by limiting the scope of dejagnu's ::unknown override.
>>
>> Tested on x86_64-linux.
>>
>> Any comments?
>
> We should ask the DejaGnu folks to make the exiting on error
> optional, so that in a future version we can drop the hack.
>
Agreed.
> What about, say, an error due to calling a tcl proc with the wrong
> arguments? "unknown" isn't called for that. Any idea how to
> catch those?
>
If I do:
...
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/O2_float_param.exp
b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/O2_float_param.exp
index 09ebeec405..afbf6c5ace 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/O2_float_param.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/O2_float_param.exp
@@ -29,3 +29,9 @@ runto "increment"
gdb_test "frame" \
"#0\\s+callee\\.increment \\(val(=val@entry)?=99\\.0,
msg=\\.\\.\\.\\).*"
+
+proc foo { a b c } {
+
+}
+
+foo
...
and run the test-suite, I get:
...
Running
/data/gdb_versions/devel/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/O2_float_param.exp ...
ERROR: tcl error sourcing
/data/gdb_versions/devel/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/O2_float_param.exp.
ERROR: wrong # args: should be "foo a b c"
while executing
"foo"
(file
"/data/gdb_versions/devel/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/O2_float_param.exp"
line 37)
invoked from within
"source
/data/gdb_versions/devel/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/O2_float_param.exp"
("uplevel" body line 1)
invoked from within
"uplevel #0 source
/data/gdb_versions/devel/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/O2_float_param.exp"
invoked from within
"catch "uplevel #0 source $test_file_name""
Running
/data/gdb_versions/devel/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/access_tagged_param.exp
...
Running
/data/gdb_versions/devel/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/access_to_packed_array.exp
...
...
...
So, the error is caught in proc runtest:
...
if { [catch "uplevel #0 source $test_file_name"] == 1 } {
...
>> +# Save the unknown proc defined by dejagnu.
>> +rename ::unknown ::dejagnu_unknown
>> +
>> +# Override the unknown proc with a gdb-local version.
>> +proc unknown { args } {
>> + set script [info script]
>> +
>> + set script [file dirname $script]
>> + set subdir3 [file tail $script]
>> +
>> + set script [file dirname $script]
>> + set subdir2 [file tail $script]
>> +
>> + set script [file dirname $script]
>> + set subdir1 [file tail $script]
>> +
>> + if { $subdir1 == "gdb"
>> + && $subdir2 == "testsuite"
>> + && [regexp {^gdb[.]} $subdir3] } {
>> + # If we're executing a gdb test-case, skip dejagnu_unknown to prevent
>> + # it from exiting and aborting the entire test run.
>> + return [uplevel 1 ::tcl_unknown $args]
>> + }
>> +
>
> I'd think it would be cleaner to override unknown in gdb_init,
> and restore in gdb_finish. No need for filename matching that way.
> Like below. Any reason you didn't go for this instead?
>
I don't think it's cleaner, because we run default_gdb_init, as well the
bit of proc runtest between ${tool}_init a ${tool}_finish with the
altered ::unknown.
Alternatively, we could override source to detect the precise point that
runtest hands control to the test-case, as attached. But there's still
filename matching. [ Note btw, that this approach changes the scope of
the fix slightly. ]
Thanks,
- Tom
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-gdb-testsuite-Don-t-abort-testrun-for-invalid-command-in-test-case.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2035 bytes --]
[gdb/testsuite] Don't abort testrun for invalid command in test-case
Say we add a call to foobar at the end of a test-case, and run the
test-suite. We'll run into a dejagnu error:
...
ERROR: (DejaGnu) proc "foobar" does not exist.
...
and the test-suite run is aborted.
It's reasonable that the test-case is aborted, but it's not reasonable that
the testsuite run is aborted.
Problems in one test-case should not leak into other test-cases, and they
generally don't. The exception is the "invalid command name" problem due to
an override of ::unknown in dejagnu's framework.exp.
Fix this by limiting the scope of dejagnu's ::unknown override.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2020-06-11 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
PR testsuite/26110
* lib/gdb.exp (gdb_unknown): New proc.
(::tcl_source): Rename from ::source.
(source): New proc.
---
gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp b/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
index 51f8a05464..ae6d561a10 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
@@ -7243,5 +7243,35 @@ proc with_override { name override body } {
return $result
}
+proc gdb_unknown { args } {
+ # Skip dejagnu_unknown to prevent it from exiting and aborting the entire
+ # test run.
+ return [uplevel 1 ::tcl_unknown $args]
+}
+
+rename ::source ::tcl_source
+
+proc source { arg } {
+ set script $arg
+
+ set script [file dirname $script]
+ set subdir3 [file tail $script]
+
+ set script [file dirname $script]
+ set subdir2 [file tail $script]
+
+ set script [file dirname $script]
+ set subdir1 [file tail $script]
+
+ if { $subdir1 == "gdb"
+ && $subdir2 == "testsuite"
+ && [regexp {^gdb[.]} $subdir3] } {
+ return \
+ [uplevel 1 with_override ::unknown gdb_unknown \"::tcl_source $arg\"]
+ }
+
+ return [uplevel 1 ::tcl_source $arg]
+}
+
# Always load compatibility stuff.
load_lib future.exp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-11 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-11 14:35 Tom de Vries
2020-06-11 15:31 ` Pedro Alves
2020-06-11 16:25 ` Tom de Vries [this message]
2020-06-11 16:56 ` Pedro Alves
2020-06-11 22:55 ` Tom de Vries
2020-06-16 12:47 ` Pedro Alves
2020-06-17 14:14 ` Tom de Vries
2020-06-17 14:19 ` Pedro Alves
2020-06-18 10:16 ` [PATCH][gdb/testsuite] Move code from gdb_init to default_gdb_init Tom de Vries
2020-06-18 10:56 ` Pedro Alves
2020-06-12 7:47 ` [PATCH][gdb/testsuite] Don't abort testrun for invalid command in test-case Tom de Vries
2020-06-12 8:37 ` Tom de Vries
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=18e36963-4f04-f871-33fb-89a5d1683bbd@suse.de \
--to=tdevries@suse.de \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox