Re: [PATCH+doc] Fix PR threads/19422 - show which thread caused stop

[Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>]

On 01/14/2016 07:06 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> > Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 18:59:57 +0000
>> > From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
>> > CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>> > 
>>> > > No: we already announce signals with "Program received signal".  But
>>> > > with breakpoints, we just say "Breakpoint 1", not "Program hit
>>> > > breakpoint 1".
>> > 
>> > Sure.  Following your suggestion ends up with:
>> > 
>> >    Thread 1 "main": breakpoint 1
>> >    Thread 1 "main" received signal SIGINT, Interrupt.
>> > 
>> > which seems inconsistent to me.
> Do we really have to be consistent here?  We weren't before your
> change.
> 
>>> > > Besides, "hit a breakpoint" is jargon, which is another reason I
>>> > > wanted to get rid of it.
>> > 
>> > What do you mean, jargon?
> "Hit a breakpoint" is jargon.  We don't really "hit" anything.  A
> breakpoint breaks, or triggers.

Nothing actually "breaks" either.  :-)  I think it's as much jargon
as the word "breakpoint" itself.  IOW, it may not be understood by
someone not familiar with a debugger, but anyone familiar with using
a debugger understands it.

> 
>> > GDB already uses the term:
>> > 
>> > (gdb) info breakpoints
>> > Num     Type           Disp Enb Address            What
>> > 1       breakpoint     keep y   0x000000000040073e in main at threads.c:40
>> >         breakpoint already hit 1 time
>> >                            ^^^^^^^^^^
> Yes, but that one is pretty much confined to its corner.  The message
> that announces a breakpoint is much more visible.
> 
> Anyway, we can agree to disagree.  No big deal.

Yes, I think so.

Looking up online for documentation of several debuggers, tutorials, etc., I
see "breakpoint hit" mentioned all over the place.  Some examples:

http://bashdb.sourceforge.net/bashdb.html

  "There is also a notion of a “one-time” breakpoint which gets deleted as soon as
   it is hit, so that that breakpoint is executed once only. "

http://lldb.llvm.org/lldb-gdb.html

  "Run until we hit line 12 or control leaves the current function."

http://docs.roguewave.com/totalview/8.15.10/html/User_Guides/UsingthegSpecifier.html

  "Thread 1.1 hit breakpoint 1 at line 35 in ".breakpoint_here""

https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/5557y8b4.aspx

   "When you run this code in the debugger, execution stops whenever
    the breakpoint is hit, before the code on that line is executed."

etc.

I really honestly believe that nobody will be confused.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves