Re: [PATCH 13/16] Drop non-prototype C function header variants: 'list' test case

[Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>]

On 11/12/2014 03:05 PM, Andreas Arnez wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12 2014, Pedro Alves wrote:
> 
>> On 10/29/2014 04:00 PM, Andreas Arnez wrote:
>>> Remove old-style function header variants from list0.h and list1.c.
>>> Fill the removed lines with comments or empty lines, such that the
>>> line numbering is undisturbed.
>>
>> Why is it important that the line numbering is undisturbed?
> 
> Changes to the line numbering would require heavy adjustments to
> list.exp.  Many line numbers are hard-coded, as well as a fair amount of
> knowledge about the source code in and around certain lines.  Thus the
> dependency on the line numbering can not be eliminated so easily here,
> and it may not even be a useful goal for a "list" test case.  Another
> option might be to adjust the literal line numbers in list.exp, but even
> that is not as straightforward as it may seem, since the test case
> expects certain source lines to be exactly n lines apart.
> 
> I'll add the above explanation to the commit message, OK?

OK.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves