* [PATCH v2] gdb: align siginfo_t with the Linux kernel definition
@ 2026-06-25 19:39 Matthieu Longo
2026-06-27 7:13 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Matthieu Longo @ 2026-06-25 19:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann, Tom Tromey, Andrew Burgess, Matthieu Longo
GDB's current definition of siginfo_t is missing many fields present in
the Linux kernel definition [1].
These fields are useful for providing detailed, user-friendly diagnostics
when a fault occurs. Some new AArch64 extensions, such as Permission
Overlay Enhancement used to implement Protection Keys [2], require the
debugger to inspect 'si_pkey' alongside 'si_addr' to help the user identify
the problematic key.
This patch aligns GDB's definition of the __sifields._sigfault member of
siginfo_t with the definition from the Linux kernel master branch.
[1]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/
tree/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h#n69
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20160212210213.ABC488FA@viggo.jf.intel.com/
Reviewed-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org>
---
gdb/linux-tdep.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/linux-tdep.c b/gdb/linux-tdep.c
index a7381677498..19289cf4b3f 100644
--- a/gdb/linux-tdep.c
+++ b/gdb/linux-tdep.c
@@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ linux_get_siginfo_type (struct gdbarch *gdbarch)
struct type *void_ptr_type;
struct type *uid_type, *pid_type;
struct type *sigval_type, *clock_type;
- struct type *siginfo_type, *sifields_type;
+ struct type *siginfo_type, *sifields_type, *sigfault_union_type;
struct type *type;
linux_gdbarch_data = get_linux_gdbarch_data (gdbarch);
@@ -285,11 +285,21 @@ linux_get_siginfo_type (struct gdbarch *gdbarch)
type_allocator alloc (gdbarch);
const struct builtin_type *builtin_types = builtin_type (gdbarch);
+ struct type *short_type = builtin_types->builtin_short;
struct type *int_type = builtin_types->builtin_int;
struct type *uint_type = builtin_types->builtin_unsigned_int;
struct type *long_type = builtin_types->builtin_long;
+ struct type *unsigned_long_type = builtin_types->builtin_unsigned_long;
+ struct type *uint32_type = builtin_types->builtin_uint32;
void_ptr_type = lookup_pointer_type (builtin_type (gdbarch)->builtin_void);
+ /* Compute padding length, i.e. __ADDR_BND_PKEY_PAD. */
+ unsigned alignof_void_ptr = type_align (void_ptr_type);
+ unsigned padding_size = (alignof_void_ptr < sizeof(short)
+ ? sizeof(short)
+ : alignof_void_ptr);
+ struct type *addr_bnd_pkey_padding_type
+ = init_vector_type (builtin_types->builtin_uint8, padding_size);
/* sival_t */
sigval_type = arch_composite_type (gdbarch, NULL, TYPE_CODE_UNION);
@@ -364,9 +374,41 @@ linux_get_siginfo_type (struct gdbarch *gdbarch)
append_composite_type_field (type, "si_stime", clock_type);
append_composite_type_field (sifields_type, "_sigchld", type);
- /* _sigfault */
+ /* Begin _sigfault's anonymous union. */
+ sigfault_union_type = arch_composite_type (gdbarch, NULL, TYPE_CODE_UNION);
+ /* used on alpha and sparc */
+ append_composite_type_field (sigfault_union_type, "si_trapno", int_type);
+ /* used when si_code=BUS_MCEERR_AR or used when si_code=BUS_MCEERR_AO */
+ append_composite_type_field (sigfault_union_type, "si_addr_lsb", short_type);
+
+ /* used when si_code=SEGV_BNDERR */
+ type = arch_composite_type (gdbarch, NULL, TYPE_CODE_STRUCT);
+ append_composite_type_field (type, "_dummy_bnd", addr_bnd_pkey_padding_type);
+ append_composite_type_field (type, "si_lower", void_ptr_type);
+ append_composite_type_field (type, "si_upper", void_ptr_type);
+ append_composite_type_field (sigfault_union_type, "_addr_bnd", type);
+
+ /* used when si_code=SEGV_PKUERR */
+ type = arch_composite_type (gdbarch, NULL, TYPE_CODE_STRUCT);
+ append_composite_type_field (type, "_dummy_pkey", addr_bnd_pkey_padding_type);
+ append_composite_type_field (type, "si_pkey", uint32_type);
+ append_composite_type_field (sigfault_union_type, "_addr_pkey", type);
+
+ /* used when si_code=TRAP_PERF */
+ type = arch_composite_type (gdbarch, NULL, TYPE_CODE_STRUCT);
+ append_composite_type_field (type, "si_perf_data", unsigned_long_type);
+ append_composite_type_field (type, "si_perf_type", uint32_type);
+ append_composite_type_field (type, "si_perf_flags", uint32_type);
+ append_composite_type_field (sigfault_union_type, "_perf", type);
+
+ /* End _sigfault's anonymous union. */
+
+ /* _sigfault is set by SIGILL, SIGFPE, SIGSEGV, SIGBUS, SIGTRAP, SIGEMT */
type = arch_composite_type (gdbarch, NULL, TYPE_CODE_STRUCT);
append_composite_type_field (type, "si_addr", void_ptr_type);
+ /* Since there is no possiblity to declare an anonymous union,
+ using '_' instead. */
+ append_composite_type_field (type, "_", sigfault_union_type);
append_composite_type_field (sifields_type, "_sigfault", type);
/* _sigpoll */
--
2.54.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] gdb: align siginfo_t with the Linux kernel definition
2026-06-25 19:39 [PATCH v2] gdb: align siginfo_t with the Linux kernel definition Matthieu Longo
@ 2026-06-27 7:13 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2026-06-29 9:56 ` Matthieu Longo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thiago Jung Bauermann @ 2026-06-27 7:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matthieu Longo; +Cc: gdb-patches, Tom Tromey, Andrew Burgess
Hello Matthieu,
Sorry, I just noticed one small nit now:
Matthieu Longo <matthieu.longo@arm.com> writes:
> + /* End _sigfault's anonymous union. */
> +
> + /* _sigfault is set by SIGILL, SIGFPE, SIGSEGV, SIGBUS, SIGTRAP, SIGEMT */
> type = arch_composite_type (gdbarch, NULL, TYPE_CODE_STRUCT);
> append_composite_type_field (type, "si_addr", void_ptr_type);
> + /* Since there is no possiblity to declare an anonymous union,
Typo: possiblity
No need to send a v3 just because of this. You can adjust this locally
before committing if this version is approved.
> + using '_' instead. */
> + append_composite_type_field (type, "_", sigfault_union_type);
> append_composite_type_field (sifields_type, "_sigfault", type);
>
> /* _sigpoll */
--
Thiago
(he/him)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] gdb: align siginfo_t with the Linux kernel definition
2026-06-27 7:13 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
@ 2026-06-29 9:56 ` Matthieu Longo
2026-07-01 5:28 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Matthieu Longo @ 2026-06-29 9:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thiago Jung Bauermann; +Cc: gdb-patches, Tom Tromey, Andrew Burgess
On 27/06/2026 08:13, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> Hello Matthieu,
>
> Sorry, I just noticed one small nit now:
>
> Matthieu Longo <matthieu.longo@arm.com> writes:
>
>> + /* End _sigfault's anonymous union. */
>> +
>> + /* _sigfault is set by SIGILL, SIGFPE, SIGSEGV, SIGBUS, SIGTRAP, SIGEMT */
>> type = arch_composite_type (gdbarch, NULL, TYPE_CODE_STRUCT);
>> append_composite_type_field (type, "si_addr", void_ptr_type);
>> + /* Since there is no possiblity to declare an anonymous union,
>
> Typo: possiblity
>
> No need to send a v3 just because of this. You can adjust this locally
> before committing if this version is approved.
>
>> + using '_' instead. */
>> + append_composite_type_field (type, "_", sigfault_union_type);
>> append_composite_type_field (sifields_type, "_sigfault", type);
>>
>> /* _sigpoll */
>
Fixed locally.
Thanks.
Do you know by any chance of a specific maintainer that should be tagged to review this patch ?
Are the people in copy the right ones ?
Matthieu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] gdb: align siginfo_t with the Linux kernel definition
2026-06-29 9:56 ` Matthieu Longo
@ 2026-07-01 5:28 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thiago Jung Bauermann @ 2026-07-01 5:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matthieu Longo; +Cc: gdb-patches, Tom Tromey, Andrew Burgess
Matthieu Longo <matthieu.longo@arm.com> writes:
> Do you know by any chance of a specific maintainer that should be tagged to review this
> patch ?
We don't have a maintainer specifically for the Linux target. My
understanding is that this patch needs to be approved by a global maintainer.
> Are the people in copy the right ones ?
Yes, they're global maintainers.
If there's no additional review after one or two weeks, it's fine to
ping the patch.
Alternatively, you can post a v3 with the typo fix. It then becomes easy
for them to notice that there's no reply to the patch and it needs
review.
--
Thiago
(he/him)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-01 5:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-06-25 19:39 [PATCH v2] gdb: align siginfo_t with the Linux kernel definition Matthieu Longo
2026-06-27 7:13 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2026-06-29 9:56 ` Matthieu Longo
2026-07-01 5:28 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox