From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Doug Evans <xdje42@gmail.com>,
Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>,
"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] skip_prolgoue (amd64)
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 11:32:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52A5AA24.2090608@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52A5206C.5070301@codesourcery.com>
On 12/09/2013 01:44 AM, Yao Qi wrote:
> I am wondering we may remove the call in prepare_execute_command,
> because it is more "precise" to flush cache for every event than for
> every command. However, I am not sure, but I attach the patch.
No, because one can issue several commands even if the target
never reports any stop. E.g., disassemble, wait a while,
memory changes, disassemble, etc.
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-09 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-29 14:27 [PATCH 0/3] Use target_read_code in skip_prologue Yao Qi
2013-11-29 14:27 ` [PATCH 2/3] skip_prolgoue (amd64) Yao Qi
2013-11-29 14:38 ` Mark Kettenis
2013-11-29 18:55 ` Mark Kettenis
2013-11-30 3:40 ` Yao Qi
2013-11-30 12:01 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-02 7:34 ` Yao Qi
2013-12-03 18:28 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-04 2:34 ` Yao Qi
2013-12-04 12:08 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-04 15:38 ` Tom Tromey
2013-12-04 18:31 ` Doug Evans
2013-12-05 11:31 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-05 1:21 ` Yao Qi
2013-12-05 12:08 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-05 14:08 ` Yao Qi
2013-12-05 14:37 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-08 8:01 ` Yao Qi
2013-12-08 8:26 ` Doug Evans
2013-12-09 1:45 ` Yao Qi
2013-12-09 11:32 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2013-12-09 11:53 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-09 13:03 ` Yao Qi
2013-12-09 13:13 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-09 13:58 ` Yao Qi
2013-12-09 15:34 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-10 0:57 ` Yao Qi
2013-12-10 10:23 ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-10 12:02 ` Yao Qi
2013-12-04 17:42 ` Doug Evans
2013-12-04 18:00 ` Doug Evans
2013-12-04 17:54 ` Doug Evans
2013-12-05 1:39 ` Yao Qi
2013-12-05 11:47 ` Pedro Alves
2013-11-29 14:36 ` [PATCH 1/3] Use target_read_code in skip_prologue (i386) Yao Qi
2013-11-30 11:43 ` Pedro Alves
2013-11-29 14:38 ` [PATCH 3/3] Perf test case: skip-prologue Yao Qi
2013-12-03 7:34 ` Yao Qi
2013-12-10 12:45 ` Yao Qi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52A5AA24.2090608@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=xdje42@gmail.com \
--cc=yao@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox