Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
To: Doug Evans <xdje42@gmail.com>
Cc: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>,
	Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>,
	"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] skip_prolgoue (amd64)
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 01:45:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52A5206C.5070301@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP9bCMRG2RkWLoVgE56OAXs0hoghv_Bfq-PwuGQy5wMYo2GK8A@mail.gmail.com>

On 12/08/2013 04:25 PM, Doug Evans wrote:
> If you're going for correctness here, note that this is just another heuristic.
> It gets one closer, but as long as at least one thread is still running ....
> 

I remind myself adding comments like that, but forgot doing so in the
end.  Add it in the comments in the updated patch.

> Question: Does this obviate the need to call target_dcache_invalidate elsewhere?
> If so, removing other uses that this subsumes should be part of this patch.
> 

Presently, target_dcache_invalidate is called by some places:

 - In commands on dcache and memattr,
 - In target_load and target_resume,
 - In tfind_1,
 - In prepare_execute_command,

I am wondering we may remove the call in prepare_execute_command,
because it is more "precise" to flush cache for every event than for
every command.  However, I am not sure, but I attach the patch.

> Nit: "cache would be staled" is bad English.
> "the cache could be stale" would be better, though I'm sure there is
> something even better than that.
> [I suspect there's at least one too many commas in there too, but one
> can nitpick too much. :-)]

Fixed.

-- 
Yao (齐尧)

gdb:

2013-12-09  Yao Qi  <yao@codesourcery.com>

	* infrun.c: Include "target-dcache.h".
	(handle_inferior_event): Flush target cache.
---
 gdb/infrun.c |    7 +++++++
 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/infrun.c b/gdb/infrun.c
index 3b55583..2901d09 100644
--- a/gdb/infrun.c
+++ b/gdb/infrun.c
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@
 #include "objfiles.h"
 #include "completer.h"
 #include "target-descriptions.h"
+#include "target-dcache.h"
 
 /* Prototypes for local functions */
 
@@ -3168,6 +3169,12 @@ handle_inferior_event (struct execution_control_state *ecs)
 {
   enum stop_kind stop_soon;
 
+  /* If we've got an event from target, it means the target was
+     running and cache could be stale.  Flush target cache before
+     handling each event.  This is just a heuristic.  Running threads
+     may modify target memory, but we don't get any event.  */
+  target_dcache_invalidate ();
+
   if (ecs->ws.kind == TARGET_WAITKIND_IGNORE)
     {
       /* We had an event in the inferior, but we are not interested in
-- 
1.7.7.6

gdb:

2013-12-09  Yao Qi  <yao@codesourcery.com>

	* top.c: Don't include "target-dcache.h".
	(prepare_execute_command): Remove the call to
	target_dcache_invalidate.
---
 gdb/top.c |    8 --------
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/top.c b/gdb/top.c
index 8ce1a9f..b7df81b 100644
--- a/gdb/top.c
+++ b/gdb/top.c
@@ -28,7 +28,6 @@
 #include "exceptions.h"
 #include <signal.h>
 #include "target.h"
-#include "target-dcache.h"
 #include "breakpoint.h"
 #include "gdbtypes.h"
 #include "expression.h"
@@ -332,13 +331,6 @@ prepare_execute_command (void)
   mark = value_mark ();
   cleanup = make_cleanup_value_free_to_mark (mark);
 
-  /* With multiple threads running while the one we're examining is
-     stopped, the dcache can get stale without us being able to detect
-     it.  For the duration of the command, though, use the dcache to
-     help things like backtrace.  */
-  if (non_stop)
-    target_dcache_invalidate ();
-
   return cleanup;
 }
 
-- 
1.7.7.6


  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-09  1:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-29 14:27 [PATCH 0/3] Use target_read_code in skip_prologue Yao Qi
2013-11-29 14:27 ` [PATCH 2/3] skip_prolgoue (amd64) Yao Qi
2013-11-29 14:38   ` Mark Kettenis
2013-11-29 18:55     ` Mark Kettenis
2013-11-30  3:40       ` Yao Qi
2013-11-30 12:01         ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-02  7:34           ` Yao Qi
2013-12-03 18:28             ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-04  2:34             ` Yao Qi
2013-12-04 12:08               ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-04 15:38                 ` Tom Tromey
2013-12-04 18:31                   ` Doug Evans
2013-12-05 11:31                   ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-05  1:21                 ` Yao Qi
2013-12-05 12:08                   ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-05 14:08                     ` Yao Qi
2013-12-05 14:37                       ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-08  8:01                 ` Yao Qi
2013-12-08  8:26                   ` Doug Evans
2013-12-09  1:45                     ` Yao Qi [this message]
2013-12-09 11:32                       ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-09 11:53                   ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-09 13:03                     ` Yao Qi
2013-12-09 13:13                       ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-09 13:58                         ` Yao Qi
2013-12-09 15:34                           ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-10  0:57                             ` Yao Qi
2013-12-10 10:23                               ` Pedro Alves
2013-12-10 12:02                                 ` Yao Qi
2013-12-04 17:42             ` Doug Evans
2013-12-04 18:00             ` Doug Evans
2013-12-04 17:54           ` Doug Evans
2013-12-05  1:39             ` Yao Qi
2013-12-05 11:47             ` Pedro Alves
2013-11-29 14:36 ` [PATCH 1/3] Use target_read_code in skip_prologue (i386) Yao Qi
2013-11-30 11:43   ` Pedro Alves
2013-11-29 14:38 ` [PATCH 3/3] Perf test case: skip-prologue Yao Qi
2013-12-03  7:34   ` Yao Qi
2013-12-10 12:45     ` Yao Qi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52A5206C.5070301@codesourcery.com \
    --to=yao@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=xdje42@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox