From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Move notif_queue to remote_state
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 10:48:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <524BF9FA.6010208@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <524B7C65.3030005@codesourcery.com>
On 10/02/2013 02:52 AM, Yao Qi wrote:
> On 10/01/2013 01:08 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
>>> -static void
>>>> -notif_xfree (struct notif_client *notif)
>> ...
>>>> - if (notif->pending_event != NULL
>>>> - && notif->pending_event->dtr != NULL)
>>>> - notif->pending_event->dtr (notif->pending_event);
>> Hmm, it's not clear to me from reading the patch where is
>> pending_event released after this patch. Could you help
>> me understand that?
>
> Since notif_queue is a global variable, we've never used QUEUE_free to
> free notif_queue, so notif_xfree is never called, and pending_event on
> each notif_client is not released.
>
> When we move notif_queue to 'remote_notif_state', we have to explicitly
> use QUEUE_free to free notif_queue and elements in it. We put the
> pointer of each notif_client to notif_queue, so we don't need a function
> to free the notif_client when notif_queue is destroyed. So the
> notif_queue is allocated like this,
>
> notif_state->notif_queue = QUEUE_alloc (notif_client_p, NULL);
>
> and notif_xfree is not needed any more. The leak on pending_event is
> still there, but it is fixed by the next patch, which moves
> pending_event to remote_notif_state, and pending_event is freed in
> remote_notif_state_xfree.
I see now, thanks.
BTW:
+struct remote_notif_state
+{
+ /* Notification queue. */
+ QUEUE(notif_client_p) *notif_queue;
+
+ /* Asynchronous signal handle registered as event loop source for when
+ the remote sent us a notification. The registered callback
+ will do a ACK sequence to pull the rest of the events out of
+ the remote side into our event queue. */
+
+ struct async_event_handler *remote_async_get_pending_events_token;
Since remote_async_get_pending_events_token is no longer a global,
it doesn't need the "remote_" prefix (or even remote_async_?) anymore.
WDYT?
The patch is OK with or without that change.
Thanks,
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-02 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-19 1:56 [PATCH 0/6 V5] MI notification on trace started/stopped Yao Qi
2013-08-19 1:56 ` [PATCH 1/6] Move notif_queue to remote_state Yao Qi
2013-09-25 16:12 ` Pedro Alves
2013-09-30 7:34 ` Yao Qi
2013-09-30 7:58 ` Move pending_event to remote_notif_state ([PATCH 1/6] Move notif_queue to remote_state) Yao Qi
2013-09-30 19:34 ` Pedro Alves
2013-10-04 7:42 ` Yao Qi
2013-09-30 17:08 ` [PATCH 1/6] Move notif_queue to remote_state Pedro Alves
2013-10-01 14:08 ` Yao Qi
2013-10-02 1:54 ` Yao Qi
2013-10-02 10:48 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2013-10-04 7:36 ` Yao Qi
2013-08-19 1:56 ` [PATCH 4/6] async remote notification 'Trace' Yao Qi
2013-08-19 1:56 ` [PATCH 6/6] MI notification on trace stop: triggered by remote Yao Qi
2013-08-19 1:56 ` [PATCH 3/6] Query supported notifications by qSupported Yao Qi
2013-08-19 1:56 ` [PATCH 5/6] MI notification on trace started/stopped:basic Yao Qi
2013-08-19 1:56 ` [PATCH 2/6] Add annex in an async remote notification Yao Qi
2013-09-26 18:43 ` Pedro Alves
2013-09-27 1:44 ` Yao Qi
2013-10-18 1:05 ` Yao Qi
2013-09-02 0:14 ` [PATCH 0/6 V5] MI notification on trace started/stopped Yao Qi
2013-09-18 13:24 ` [ping 2]: " Yao Qi
2013-09-18 13:25 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=524BF9FA.6010208@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=yao@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox