From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Pierre Muller <pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA] windows-nat.c: Handle ERROR_PARTIAL_COPY in windows_xfer_memory function
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 12:50:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52248978.90500@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5223bb46.c6c0420a.5a41.008dSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
On 09/01/2013 11:10 PM, Pierre Muller wrote:
> This is the patch that Pedro suggested I send
> after his commit to remove deprecated_xfer_memory
> in windows-nat.c.
Thanks.
>
> Pedro suggested that I submit this patch separately
> (which I do here)... and with a gdbserver counterpart,
> which I don't...
>
> I tried, but finally realized that given the
> read_memory / write_memory functions type defined
> in target.h target_ops structure,
> there is no way of passing information of partial
> copy and of the length of this partial copy.
> Indeed, the comments state that the return value is either 0 for success
> or errno...
>
> This is not compatible with returning information that only part of the
> request length
> was read/written.
Well, we could just change that interface to make it possible...
The thing I don't like with doing this only on the native
side, is that we're trying to get to a point where we
can share the target backends between GDB and gdbserver:
<https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/LocalRemoteFeatureParity>.
Doing such a change on the GDB side only just means we're
pushing the feature-parity goal for the Windows port
further away...
> 2013-09-01 Pierre Muller <muller@sourceware.org>
>
...
> Handle ERROR_PARTIAL_COPY error code.
...
This part is OK too. (Please commit it separately from the
plongest fix.)
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-02 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <5223bb46.c6c0420a.5a41.008dSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2013-09-02 12:34 ` Pedro Alves
2013-09-02 12:48 ` Pierre Muller
2013-09-02 12:50 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2013-09-02 13:05 ` Pierre Muller
2013-09-02 13:19 ` Pedro Alves
2013-09-02 13:38 ` [RFA] gdbserver/win32-low.c: Check Read/WriteProcessMemory return value (followup to [RFA] windows-nat.c: Handle ERROR_PARTIAL_COPY in windows_xfer_memory function) Pierre Muller
[not found] ` <522494dc.297a420a.6ab0.6047SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2013-09-02 13:50 ` Pedro Alves
2013-09-02 14:01 ` Pierre Muller
[not found] ` <52249a22.42bd420a.28f1.722cSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2013-09-02 14:09 ` Pedro Alves
2013-09-02 14:18 ` Pierre Muller
[not found] ` <52249e27.e8a4420a.4293.ffff89a0SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2013-09-02 14:19 ` Pedro Alves
2013-09-02 14:25 ` [RFA-v2] " Pierre Muller
2013-09-02 14:29 ` Pedro Alves
2013-09-02 14:35 ` Pierre Muller
2013-09-01 22:10 [RFA] windows-nat.c: Handle ERROR_PARTIAL_COPY in windows_xfer_memory function Pierre Muller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52248978.90500@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox