From: "Pierre Muller" <pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
To: "'Pedro Alves'" <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: RE: [RFA] windows-nat.c: Handle ERROR_PARTIAL_COPY in windows_xfer_memory function
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 13:05:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000301cea7dd$17bc4af0$4734e0d0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52248978.90500@redhat.com>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-patches-
> owner@sourceware.org] De la part de Pedro Alves
> Envoyé : lundi 2 septembre 2013 14:50
> À : Pierre Muller
> Cc : gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Objet : Re: [RFA] windows-nat.c: Handle ERROR_PARTIAL_COPY in
> windows_xfer_memory function
>
> On 09/01/2013 11:10 PM, Pierre Muller wrote:
> > This is the patch that Pedro suggested I send
> > after his commit to remove deprecated_xfer_memory
> > in windows-nat.c.
>
> Thanks.
>
> >
> > Pedro suggested that I submit this patch separately
> > (which I do here)... and with a gdbserver counterpart,
> > which I don't...
> >
> > I tried, but finally realized that given the
> > read_memory / write_memory functions type defined
> > in target.h target_ops structure,
> > there is no way of passing information of partial
> > copy and of the length of this partial copy.
> > Indeed, the comments state that the return value is either 0 for success
> > or errno...
> >
> > This is not compatible with returning information that only part of the
> > request length
> > was read/written.
>
> Well, we could just change that interface to make it possible...
>
> The thing I don't like with doing this only on the native
> side, is that we're trying to get to a point where we
> can share the target backends between GDB and gdbserver:
Well, when you look at the code inside child_xfer_memory,
you can notice that the return value of ReadProcessMemory or
WriteProcessMemory
is discarded, which means that it does behave more or less like the
new windows-nat.c code (at least in case of ERROR_PARTIAL_COPY)
for other errors, it might also return garbage...
anyhow, the calling code compares the returned value to the requested length
(LEN value)
so that the risk of generating a successful read_memory despite a failure
of ReadProcessMemory function is small... (the uninitialized variable done
would need to return the value LEN..)
It could of course still happen theoretically...
> <https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/LocalRemoteFeatureParity>.
>
> Doing such a change on the GDB side only just means we're
> pushing the feature-parity goal for the Windows port
> further away...
>
> > 2013-09-01 Pierre Muller <muller@sourceware.org>
> >
> ...
> > Handle ERROR_PARTIAL_COPY error code.
> ...
>
> This part is OK too. (Please commit it separately from the
> plongest fix.)
Thanks for the approval,
patch committed,
Pierre Muller
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-02 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <5223bb46.c6c0420a.5a41.008dSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2013-09-02 12:34 ` Pedro Alves
2013-09-02 12:48 ` Pierre Muller
2013-09-02 12:50 ` Pedro Alves
2013-09-02 13:05 ` Pierre Muller [this message]
2013-09-02 13:19 ` Pedro Alves
2013-09-02 13:38 ` [RFA] gdbserver/win32-low.c: Check Read/WriteProcessMemory return value (followup to [RFA] windows-nat.c: Handle ERROR_PARTIAL_COPY in windows_xfer_memory function) Pierre Muller
[not found] ` <522494dc.297a420a.6ab0.6047SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2013-09-02 13:50 ` Pedro Alves
2013-09-02 14:01 ` Pierre Muller
[not found] ` <52249a22.42bd420a.28f1.722cSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2013-09-02 14:09 ` Pedro Alves
2013-09-02 14:18 ` Pierre Muller
[not found] ` <52249e27.e8a4420a.4293.ffff89a0SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2013-09-02 14:19 ` Pedro Alves
2013-09-02 14:25 ` [RFA-v2] " Pierre Muller
2013-09-02 14:29 ` Pedro Alves
2013-09-02 14:35 ` Pierre Muller
2013-09-01 22:10 [RFA] windows-nat.c: Handle ERROR_PARTIAL_COPY in windows_xfer_memory function Pierre Muller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000301cea7dd$17bc4af0$4734e0d0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr' \
--to=pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox