From: Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>
To: Edjunior Barbosa Machado <emachado@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix wp-replication.exp for targets that provide only 1 hw watchpoint
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 07:32:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <519F17A0.2040607@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1369365909-14746-1-git-send-email-emachado@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Hi,
On 05/24/2013 05:25 AM, Edjunior Barbosa Machado wrote:
> (sorry, my previous message got truncated. Resending...)
>
> Hi,
>
> current wp-replication.exp testcase counts 2 hw watchpoints even when the target
> provides only 1 hw watch, resulting in several unexpected errors. Successfully
> tested on x86 (with 4 hw watchpoints available) and ppc64 server (with 1 hw
> watch), this patch intends to fix this issue. Ok?
I wonder why it is counting one more watchpoint. Is it not matching the
output in the exit block here?
gdb_test_multiple "continue" "watchpoint created successfully" {
-re ".*Breakpoint 2, empty_cycle \\(\\).*$gdb_prompt $" {
incr hwatch_count
}
-re ".*Could not insert hardware watchpoint.*$gdb_prompt $" {
set done 1
break
}
}
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/wp-replication.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/wp-replication.exp
> index 8927a43..f73b763 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/wp-replication.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/wp-replication.exp
> @@ -78,6 +78,10 @@ while { $done == 0 } {
> }
> }
>
> + if { $done == 1 } {
> + break
> + }
> +
> gdb_test_multiple "continue" "watchpoint created successfully" {
> -re ".*Breakpoint 2, empty_cycle \\(\\).*$gdb_prompt $" {
> incr hwatch_count
>
The additional if block seems to accomplish what the upcoming
gdb_test_multiple block does. If it is really a matching problem, it
seems we can fix it in that block instead of a special-case conditional.
Thanks,
Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-24 7:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-24 3:19 Edjunior Barbosa Machado
2013-05-24 3:26 ` Edjunior Barbosa Machado
2013-05-24 7:32 ` Luis Machado [this message]
2013-05-24 8:11 ` Luis Machado
2013-05-24 14:03 ` Edjunior Barbosa Machado
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=519F17A0.2040607@codesourcery.com \
--to=lgustavo@codesourcery.com \
--cc=emachado@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox