From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [4/10] RFC: unconditionally include signal.h
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:18:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50A6755C.8040607@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mwyiy8hi.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
On 15-11-2012 19:24, Tom Tromey wrote:
> I think that checking for signal.h is pointless, because gdb already
> includes it unconditionally in various places -- e.g., utils.c.
It's not pointless in gdbserver. The HAVE_SIGNAL_H checks were added for
the WinCE port. See fe7cf52e.
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-16 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-15 19:09 [0/10] RFC: use gnulib more heavily + more configure fixes Tom Tromey
2012-11-15 19:11 ` Tom Tromey
2012-11-15 19:14 ` [1/10] RFC: update gnulib Tom Tromey
2012-11-15 19:19 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-11-15 19:15 ` [0/10] RFC: use gnulib more heavily + more configure fixes Eli Zaretskii
2012-11-15 19:22 ` [3/10] RFC: remove gdb_dirent.h Tom Tromey
2012-11-16 2:46 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-11-27 20:11 ` Tom Tromey
2012-11-15 19:25 ` [4/10] RFC: unconditionally include signal.h Tom Tromey
2012-11-16 17:18 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2012-11-17 1:25 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-11-17 8:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-11-19 15:05 ` Pedro Alves
2012-11-27 20:14 ` Tom Tromey
2012-11-15 19:26 ` [5/10] RFC: don't check for stddef.h Tom Tromey
2012-11-15 19:28 ` [6/10] RFC: don't check for stdlib.h Tom Tromey
2012-11-15 19:29 ` [7/10] RFC: don't check for unistd.h Tom Tromey
2012-11-15 19:31 ` [8/10] RFC: don't check for sys/types.h Tom Tromey
2012-11-15 19:33 ` [9/10] RFC: remove gdb_stat.h Tom Tromey
2012-11-15 19:33 ` [2/10] RFC: remove gdb_string.h Tom Tromey
2012-11-15 20:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-11-15 20:22 ` Tom Tromey
2012-11-15 20:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-11-16 2:42 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-11-15 20:32 ` [10/10] RFC: remove gdb_wait.h Tom Tromey
2012-11-15 20:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-11-15 21:08 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-11-16 8:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-11-16 14:45 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-11-16 15:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-11-16 17:28 ` Pedro Alves
2012-11-16 17:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-11-16 18:10 ` Pedro Alves
2012-11-16 18:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-11-17 2:30 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-11-19 15:09 ` Pedro Alves
2012-11-16 17:55 ` [0/10] RFC: use gnulib more heavily + more configure fixes Pedro Alves
2012-11-27 21:24 ` Tom Tromey
2012-12-10 20:41 ` Tom Tromey
2012-12-11 3:11 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-12-11 10:53 ` Pedro Alves
2012-12-17 19:39 ` Tom Tromey
2013-01-03 18:25 ` Tom Tromey
2013-01-03 18:42 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50A6755C.8040607@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox