Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
To: Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com>
Cc: 'Pedro Alves' <palves@redhat.com>,
	"'dje@google.com'" <dje@google.com>,
	"'gdb-patches@sourceware.org'" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] new tracepoint downloaded MI notification.
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 00:22:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5091C0B0.5000508@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E59706EF8DB1D147B15BECA3322E4BDC014240@EUSAAMB103.ericsson.se>

On 11/01/2012 03:09 AM, Marc Khouzam wrote:
> Now that GDB pushes new tracepoints to the target immediately, that
> use-case may not apply, but I wonder if there are other situations
> where some tracepoints will be on the target and other will not?

Yes, the pending tracepoints won't be downloaded after tracing is 
started until they are resolved.  The notification is required for this 
case.

-- 
Yao


  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-01  0:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-28  0:49 [RFC 0/2] Two new MI notifications Yao Qi
2012-09-28  0:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] new tracepoint downloaded MI notification Yao Qi
2012-09-28  7:37   ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-09-28 17:44   ` Pedro Alves
2012-09-28 17:47     ` Pedro Alves
2012-09-29 14:13       ` Yao Qi
2012-10-09  8:12         ` Yao Qi
2012-10-31 17:59         ` Pedro Alves
2012-10-31 19:20           ` Doug Evans
2012-11-01  0:34           ` Yao Qi
2012-11-02 15:46             ` Pedro Alves
2012-11-02 15:50               ` Pedro Alves
2012-10-18  1:16     ` Yao Qi
2012-10-18  1:28       ` Yao Qi
2012-10-30  7:07         ` [ping]: " Yao Qi
2012-10-30 17:22           ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-10-18  4:43       ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-10-18 19:54       ` Tom Tromey
2012-09-28 17:44   ` Pedro Alves
2012-09-28 18:27   ` Tom Tromey
2012-09-28 18:29     ` Tom Tromey
2012-10-15 18:03   ` dje
2012-10-31 18:03     ` Pedro Alves
2012-10-31 19:10       ` Marc Khouzam
2012-11-01  0:22         ` Yao Qi [this message]
2012-11-22 18:33           ` Pedro Alves
2012-11-29 15:47             ` Yao Qi
2012-11-29 16:00               ` Pedro Alves
2012-11-29 19:34                 ` Marc Khouzam
2012-09-28  0:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] new memory-changed " Yao Qi
2012-09-28  7:36   ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-09-28  7:58     ` Yao Qi
2012-09-28  8:25       ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-09-28 17:17   ` Tom Tromey
2012-09-29  1:18     ` Yao Qi
2012-10-09  7:44     ` Yao Qi
2012-10-15 17:58       ` dje
2012-10-15 19:07         ` Tom Tromey
2012-10-16  7:12         ` Yao Qi
2012-10-15 19:03       ` Tom Tromey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5091C0B0.5000508@codesourcery.com \
    --to=yao@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=dje@google.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=marc.khouzam@ericsson.com \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox