Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
To: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>,
	Leszek Swirski via gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Cc: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@google.com>, palves@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] [amd64] Fix AMD64 return value ABI in expression evaluation
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 22:30:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4bbf8dae-f071-d611-17e6-78f61dffbd27@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87v9zducov.fsf@tromey.com>

On 16-04-19 18:39, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>> ">" == Leszek Swirski via gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> writes:
> 
>>> This ABI mismatch resulted in issues when calling a function that returns
>>> a class of size <16 bytes which has a base class, including issues such
>>> as the "this" pointer being incorrect (as it was passed as the second
>>> argument rather than the first).
> 
> I'm still looking into the problem, but this regressed an internal test
> case here at AdaCore.

For me, this commit regresses like this:
...
FAIL: gdb.base/call-ar-st.exp: print print_small_structs (timeout)
FAIL: gdb.base/call-ar-st.exp: print print_small_structs from
print_long_arg_list (timeout)
FAIL: gdb.base/call-ar-st.exp: print
print_bit_flags_combo(*bit_flags_combo) (timeout)
FAIL: gdb.base/call-rt-st.exp: print print_bit_flags_char(*cflags)
FAIL: gdb.base/call-rt-st.exp: print print_bit_flags_char(*cflags)
FAIL: gdb.base/call-rt-st.exp: print print_bit_flags_short(*sflags)
FAIL: gdb.base/call-rt-st.exp: print print_bit_flags_short(*sflags)
FAIL: gdb.base/call-rt-st.exp: print print_bit_flags(*flags)
FAIL: gdb.base/call-rt-st.exp: print print_bit_flags(*flags)
FAIL: gdb.base/call-rt-st.exp: print print_bit_flags_combo(*flags_combo)
FAIL: gdb.base/call-rt-st.exp: print print_bit_flags_combo(*flags_combo)
...

Filed as PR24463 - "call-ar-st.exp/call-rt-st.exp regressions".

Thanks,
- Tom


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-17 22:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-14 13:35 [PATCH] " Leszek Swirski via gdb-patches
2019-02-14 14:28 ` Pedro Alves
2019-02-14 15:07   ` Leszek Swirski via gdb-patches
2019-02-14 15:16   ` [PATCH v2] " Leszek Swirski via gdb-patches
2019-02-14 15:18     ` [PATCH v3] " Leszek Swirski via gdb-patches
2019-02-14 15:26       ` Pedro Alves
2019-04-13 16:24         ` Leszek Swirski via gdb-patches
2019-04-16 16:39       ` Tom Tromey
2019-04-16 18:28         ` Tom Tromey
2019-04-24 18:03           ` Tom Tromey
2019-04-17 22:30         ` Tom de Vries [this message]
2019-04-18 17:54           ` Tom Tromey
2019-04-24 16:26       ` Regressions on gdb.base/call-{ar,rt}-st.exp on x86_64 native (was: Re: [PATCH v3] [amd64] Fix AMD64 return value ABI in expression evaluation) Sergio Durigan Junior
2019-04-24 17:51         ` Regressions on gdb.base/call-{ar,rt}-st.exp on x86_64 native Tom Tromey
2019-04-24 18:02           ` Sergio Durigan Junior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4bbf8dae-f071-d611-17e6-78f61dffbd27@suse.de \
    --to=tdevries@suse.de \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=leszeks@google.com \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=tom@tromey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox