Re: [PATCH] Add support for Tilera TILE-Gx processor (part 1/2: gdb)

[Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>]

Jeff,
Thanks for adding a new port tilegx in GDB.

For each patch, it needs a ChangeLog entry, so your patch part 1/2 and
2/2 needs one ChangeLog entry respectively.  Read this if it helps

  http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Change-Logs.html

You also need to provide a patch to gdb/NEWS to mention this new port.

 * New targets

 Renesas RL78                    rl78-*-elf
 HP OpenVMS ia64                 ia64-hp-openvms*

You can add tilegx in this way.

Do you have FSF copyright assignment?  If you don't have, someone here
can help you to get that done.

On 04/20/2012 03:23 AM, Jeff Kenton wrote:
> @@ -723,7 +724,7 @@
>         regcache.c reggroups.c remote.c remote-fileio.c reverse.c \
>         sentinel-frame.c \
>         serial.c ser-base.c ser-unix.c skip.c \
> -       solib.c solib-target.c source.c \
> +       solib-target.c source.c \
>         stabsread.c stack.c std-regs.c symfile.c symfile-mem.c symmisc.c \
>         symtab.c \
>         target.c target-descriptions.c target-memory.c \
> @@ -905,7 +906,7 @@
>         reggroups.o regset.o \
>         trad-frame.o \
>         tramp-frame.o \
> -       solib.o solib-target.o \
> +       solib-target.o \
>         prologue-value.o memory-map.o memrange.o \
>         xml-support.o xml-syscall.o xml-utils.o \
>         target-descriptions.o target-memory.o xml-tdesc.o xml-builtin.o \

Why do you remove solib.c and solib.o?

-- 
Yao (齐尧)