Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [RFA] fix crasher on detach command
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 19:00:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C0D41B4.3020008@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201006071937.41182.pedro@codesourcery.com>

Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Monday 07 June 2010 19:31:26, Michael Snyder wrote:
>> Pedro Alves wrote:
>>> On Monday 07 June 2010 19:11:02, Michael Snyder wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> The circumstances are, detach from a remote target that doesn't have
>>>> threads.  Remote.c leaves the PID arbitrarily as "42000", and
>>>> target_detach calls remove_breakpoints_pid, which crashes because
>>>> find_inferior_pid returns NULL.
>>> It shouldn't matter that the PID is arbitrary; there should be an
>>> inferior with that PID in the inferior list.  This probably means
>>> that the inferior got its PID cleared to 0 already when you get here?
>>> How?
>> It was a bad connect, which aborted part way through.
>> So yes, we're in an inconsistent internal state.
> 
> Then we need to fix that, instead of adding workarounds in other
> areas.

I'm not sure how feasible that is.  At this point I've had to use a
^C^C to get out of a failing attach (target remote), and I'm hoping to
use the "detach" to cancel out any remaining inconsistent state.
The ^C^C handler can't necessarily do it by itself, 'cause from its
point of view, you don't really know what state you're in or what
state you want to be in.


  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-07 19:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-07 18:11 Michael Snyder
2010-06-07 18:28 ` Pedro Alves
2010-06-07 18:31   ` Michael Snyder
2010-06-07 18:37     ` Pedro Alves
2010-06-07 19:00       ` Michael Snyder [this message]
2010-06-07 19:09         ` Pedro Alves
2010-06-07 19:12           ` Pedro Alves
2010-06-07 23:50             ` Michael Snyder
2010-06-08 12:56               ` Pedro Alves
2010-06-08  0:11             ` Michael Snyder
2010-06-08 12:59               ` Pedro Alves
2010-06-08 16:52                 ` Michael Snyder
2010-06-08  2:42   ` Hui Zhu
2010-06-08 12:54     ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C0D41B4.3020008@vmware.com \
    --to=msnyder@vmware.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox