* [OB] Fix syntax error in record_resume
@ 2009-09-01 11:54 Hui Zhu
2009-09-01 19:17 ` Stan Shebs
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hui Zhu @ 2009-09-01 11:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches ml
Checked in under the obvious rule.
Thanks,
Hui
2009-09-01 Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
* record.c (record_resume): Change "siggnal" to "signal".
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/record.c,v
retrieving revision 1.14
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -r1.14 -r1.15
--- src/gdb/record.c 2009/09/01 03:32:49 1.14
+++ src/gdb/record.c 2009/09/01 11:41:41 1.15
@@ -518,7 +518,7 @@
static void
record_resume (struct target_ops *ops, ptid_t ptid, int step,
- enum target_signal siggnal)
+ enum target_signal signal)
{
record_resume_step = step;
@@ -534,7 +534,7 @@
return;
}
record_beneath_to_resume (record_beneath_to_resume_ops, ptid, 1,
- siggnal);
+ signal);
}
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [OB] Fix syntax error in record_resume
2009-09-01 11:54 [OB] Fix syntax error in record_resume Hui Zhu
@ 2009-09-01 19:17 ` Stan Shebs
2009-09-01 19:21 ` Michael Snyder
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stan Shebs @ 2009-09-01 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hui Zhu; +Cc: gdb-patches ml
Hui Zhu wrote:
> * record.c (record_resume): Change "siggnal" to "signal".
>
FYI, a number of places in the code use "siggnal" for the variable name,
or some other name that is not "signal". Once upon a time some hosts
did nasty macro tricks with "signal" in their system headers, so it was
better for portability to use some other string. I don't know if this
is still an issue though.
Stan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [OB] Fix syntax error in record_resume
2009-09-01 19:17 ` Stan Shebs
@ 2009-09-01 19:21 ` Michael Snyder
2009-09-02 1:28 ` Hui Zhu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michael Snyder @ 2009-09-01 19:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stan Shebs; +Cc: Hui Zhu, gdb-patches ml
Stan Shebs wrote:
> Hui Zhu wrote:
>> * record.c (record_resume): Change "siggnal" to "signal".
>>
> FYI, a number of places in the code use "siggnal" for the variable name,
> or some other name that is not "signal". Once upon a time some hosts
> did nasty macro tricks with "signal" in their system headers, so it was
> better for portability to use some other string. I don't know if this
> is still an issue though.
I always thought that the name "siggnal" started with a global
variable in gdb, and then just propagated (the way it's trying
to do now). ;-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [OB] Fix syntax error in record_resume
2009-09-01 19:21 ` Michael Snyder
@ 2009-09-02 1:28 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-02 1:33 ` Hui Zhu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hui Zhu @ 2009-09-02 1:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Snyder, Stan Shebs; +Cc: gdb-patches ml
Sorry I make a big mistake. I will change it back at once.
Thanks for remind me, Stan and Michael. Thanks a lot.
Hui
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 03:20, Michael Snyder<msnyder@vmware.com> wrote:
> Stan Shebs wrote:
>>
>> Hui Zhu wrote:
>>>
>>> * record.c (record_resume): Change "siggnal" to "signal".
>>>
>>
>> FYI, a number of places in the code use "siggnal" for the variable name,
>> or some other name that is not "signal". Once upon a time some hosts did
>> nasty macro tricks with "signal" in their system headers, so it was better
>> for portability to use some other string. I don't know if this is still an
>> issue though.
>
> I always thought that the name "siggnal" started with a global
> variable in gdb, and then just propagated (the way it's trying
> to do now). ;-)
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [OB] Fix syntax error in record_resume
2009-09-02 1:28 ` Hui Zhu
@ 2009-09-02 1:33 ` Hui Zhu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hui Zhu @ 2009-09-02 1:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Snyder, Stan Shebs; +Cc: gdb-patches ml
Checked in.
Hui
2009-09-02 Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
* record.c (record_resume): Change "signal" to "siggnal".
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/record.c,v
retrieving revision 1.15
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -r1.15 -r1.16
--- src/gdb/record.c 2009/09/01 11:41:41 1.15
+++ src/gdb/record.c 2009/09/02 01:31:09 1.16
@@ -518,7 +518,7 @@
static void
record_resume (struct target_ops *ops, ptid_t ptid, int step,
- enum target_signal signal)
+ enum target_signal siggnal)
{
record_resume_step = step;
@@ -534,7 +534,7 @@
return;
}
record_beneath_to_resume (record_beneath_to_resume_ops, ptid, 1,
- signal);
+ siggnal);
}
}
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 09:27, Hui Zhu<teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry I make a big mistake. I will change it back at once.
>
> Thanks for remind me, Stan and Michael. Thanks a lot.
>
> Hui
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 03:20, Michael Snyder<msnyder@vmware.com> wrote:
>> Stan Shebs wrote:
>>>
>>> Hui Zhu wrote:
>>>>
>>>> * record.c (record_resume): Change "siggnal" to "signal".
>>>>
>>>
>>> FYI, a number of places in the code use "siggnal" for the variable name,
>>> or some other name that is not "signal". Once upon a time some hosts did
>>> nasty macro tricks with "signal" in their system headers, so it was better
>>> for portability to use some other string. I don't know if this is still an
>>> issue though.
>>
>> I always thought that the name "siggnal" started with a global
>> variable in gdb, and then just propagated (the way it's trying
>> to do now). ;-)
>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-09-02 1:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-09-01 11:54 [OB] Fix syntax error in record_resume Hui Zhu
2009-09-01 19:17 ` Stan Shebs
2009-09-01 19:21 ` Michael Snyder
2009-09-02 1:28 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-02 1:33 ` Hui Zhu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox