* [RFC] Don't assume the name of Windows serial devices?
@ 2008-03-28 14:38 Carlos O'Donell
2008-03-28 14:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Carlos O'Donell @ 2008-03-28 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 399 bytes --]
Is there any reason we restrict the Windows serial device names to
"COM?" A user could have serial boards, com ports higher than 9
(\\.\COMX), or weird file devices that act like serial ports.
The following patch removes the code that rejects devices that don't
start with the word "COM".
Comments?
Cheers,
Carlos.
--
Carlos O'Donell
CodeSourcery
carlos@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x716
[-- Attachment #2: gdb-serial.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 796 bytes --]
2008-03-28 Carlos O'Donell <carlos@codesourcery.com>
* ser-mingw.c (ser_windows_open): Open requested name.
Index: gdb/ser-mingw.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/ser-mingw.c,v
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -p -r1.12 ser-mingw.c
--- gdb/ser-mingw.c 1 Jan 2008 22:53:12 -0000 1.12
+++ gdb/ser-mingw.c 28 Mar 2008 14:32:56 -0000
@@ -51,13 +51,6 @@ ser_windows_open (struct serial *scb, co
struct ser_windows_state *state;
COMMTIMEOUTS timeouts;
- /* Only allow COM ports. */
- if (strncmp (name, "COM", 3) != 0)
- {
- errno = ENOENT;
- return -1;
- }
-
h = CreateFile (name, GENERIC_READ | GENERIC_WRITE, 0, NULL,
OPEN_EXISTING, FILE_FLAG_OVERLAPPED, NULL);
if (h == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC] Don't assume the name of Windows serial devices?
2008-03-28 14:38 [RFC] Don't assume the name of Windows serial devices? Carlos O'Donell
@ 2008-03-28 14:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-03-28 17:33 ` Carlos O'Donell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2008-03-28 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carlos O'Donell; +Cc: gdb-patches
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:37:42AM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>
> Is there any reason we restrict the Windows serial device names to "COM?"
> A user could have serial boards, com ports higher than 9 (\\.\COMX), or
> weird file devices that act like serial ports.
>
> The following patch removes the code that rejects devices that don't
> start with the word "COM".
>
> Comments?
I don't think weird file devices will act enough like serial ports for
things to work just right, but I don't see the need for the
restriction either - hopefully no one tries to open random junk
with target remote :-)
> 2008-03-28 Carlos O'Donell <carlos@codesourcery.com>
>
> * ser-mingw.c (ser_windows_open): Open requested name.
OK.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC] Don't assume the name of Windows serial devices?
2008-03-28 14:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2008-03-28 17:33 ` Carlos O'Donell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Carlos O'Donell @ 2008-03-28 17:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carlos O'Donell, gdb-patches
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>> 2008-03-28 Carlos O'Donell <carlos@codesourcery.com>
>>
>> * ser-mingw.c (ser_windows_open): Open requested name.
>
> OK.
>
Checked in. Thanks.
Cheers,
Carlos.
--
Carlos O'Donell
CodeSourcery
carlos@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x716
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-03-28 17:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-03-28 14:38 [RFC] Don't assume the name of Windows serial devices? Carlos O'Donell
2008-03-28 14:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-03-28 17:33 ` Carlos O'Donell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox