Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lerele <lerele@champenstudios.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [win32] Fix suspend count handling
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 20:34:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4749DC53.5090803@champenstudios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071125181316.GB7689@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>

Christopher Faylor escribió:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 03:44:31PM +0100, Lerele wrote:
>   
>> What do you think?
>>     
>
> There is some code in win32-nat.c which was a result of my uncertainty
> about the Windows debugging API.  I thought that since we have a couple
> more eyes on this now someone might know a bit more about how this
> works.  Understanding the foundations is never a bad idea.
>
> I'm not interested in gdbserver or what you think may be happening in
> the future.  If the SuspendThread/ResumeThread code can be eliminated
> from win32-nat.c along with all of the bookkeeping that is required to
> avoid races then it may be a good idea to do so.  Whether it is a good
> idea in light of future enhancements is a decision I can make but,
> personally, I rarely see a good reason to keep code complication around
> for the future unless someone is actually planning to do the work.
>
> We can stop talking about this now since it is apparent that no one
> actually knows the answer to my question.
>
> cgf
>
>   

Okay.
Derived from my previous messages, which by the way I do not really know 
if you read/undestood, is that for the third time I'm saying 
SuspendThread I think is safer (as you did think once) and does not 
really hurt, and it's not such a complication keeping it around, in my 
opinion.
The only problem I see is that a small bug has been detected, that's all.

If win32-nat.c is going to give control back to gdb in response to a 
Win32 debug event only, it's obvious SuspendThread is not needed.
When WaitForDebugEvent returns an event, all child threads are stopped, 
so yes, SuspendThread is *not* needed.
Is this the short answer you were looking for???

Also, may you be interested in the fact that currently interrupting a 
running program using gdb 6.7 does *not* seem to work?  Either if you 
run gdb alone (not gdbserver) or using a front-end?
To my point, as gdbserver win32 code is win32-nat.c based, funtionality 
is very similar.  One such functionality could be the latest 
SuspendThread interruption that has been added to gdbserver (but not to 
win32-nat.c).  As such, could you be interested in this for win32-nat.c?
If this functionality is of interest, then that's another reason to keep 
thread_rec/SuspendThread.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-11-25 20:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-21  0:35 Pedro Alves
2007-11-21 11:25 ` Pierre Muller
2007-11-21 13:43   ` Pedro Alves
2007-11-21 14:13     ` Pierre Muller
2007-11-21 15:08       ` Pedro Alves
2007-11-21 15:32         ` Pierre Muller
2007-11-21 18:19         ` Pedro Alves
2007-11-21 23:33           ` Pedro Alves
2007-11-22  9:19             ` Pierre Muller
2007-11-23  1:07             ` Christopher Faylor
2007-11-23 10:19               ` Lerele
2007-11-23 18:30                 ` Lerele
2007-11-24 12:43                   ` Pedro Alves
2007-11-24 14:21                     ` Lerele
2007-11-24  5:33                 ` Christopher Faylor
2007-11-24 14:18                   ` Lerele
2007-11-24 15:49                     ` Pedro Alves
2007-11-24 17:50                       ` Lerele
2007-11-24 20:49                         ` Christopher Faylor
2007-11-24 20:48                     ` Christopher Faylor
2007-11-25 14:44                       ` Lerele
2007-11-25 18:13                         ` Christopher Faylor
2007-11-25 18:56                           ` Pedro Alves
2007-11-25 22:05                             ` Christopher Faylor
2007-11-25 22:13                               ` Lerele
2007-11-25 20:34                           ` Lerele [this message]
2007-11-24 12:16               ` Pedro Alves
2007-11-24 20:51                 ` Christopher Faylor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4749DC53.5090803@champenstudios.com \
    --to=lerele@champenstudios.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox