From: Pedro Alves <pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt>
To: Pierre Muller <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [win32] Fix suspend count handling
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 23:33:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4744BCCE.60705@portugalmail.pt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4053daab0711211019r15f3a862g677080b65b4d8e71@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3620 bytes --]
Pedro Alves wrote:
> Pedro Alves wrote:
>> On Nov 21, 2007 2:13 PM, Pierre Muller wrote:
>> That's not what I see here. Can you show me a run where you get 4
>> only this patch applied?
>>
>
> I did try that, but posted a log of not doing it :-).
>
> I've just tried about 30 times, and only once I did see
> a 4 coming out ... oh, well, one of those things.
>
OK. Back at my home laptop, I can reproduce that with
no problems. Let me clarify what the 4 problem really is.
It's a race between gdb and the inferior.
Take this slightly changed test case. The only difference
to the original version is the extra Sleep call.
#include <windows.h>
HANDLE started;
HANDLE stop;
DWORD WINAPI
thread_start (void *arg)
{
SetEvent (started);
WaitForSingleObject (stop, INFINITE);
return 0;
}
int
main (int argc, char **argv)
{
int i;
DWORD suspend_count;
started = CreateEvent (NULL, TRUE, FALSE, NULL);
stop = CreateEvent (NULL, TRUE, FALSE, NULL);
HANDLE h = CreateThread (NULL, 0, thread_start, NULL,
0, NULL);
WaitForSingleObject (started, INFINITE);
for (i = 0; i < 3; i++)
if (SuspendThread (h) == (DWORD) -1)
{
printf ("SuspendThreadFailed\n");
return 1;
}
Sleep (300);
suspend_count = ResumeThread (h); /* set breakpoint here */
printf ("%lu\n", suspend_count); /* should be 3 */
while ((suspend_count = ResumeThread (h)) != 0
&& suspend_count != -1)
;
SetEvent (stop);
WaitForSingleObject (h, INFINITE);
CloseHandle (h);
CloseHandle (started);
CloseHandle (stop);
return 0;
}
If you do the "break at ...", "run", "thread 3", "continue"
sequence, and "..." is the "Sleep" line, you'll get 3,
but if you put the break at the /* set breakpoint here */
line, you'll get 4 (if you're (un)lucky).
The race happens due to the fact that gdb is
doing something similar to this:
win32_continue()
{
ContinueDebugEvent (...); /* Resumes all non suspended
threads of the process. */
/* At this point, gdb is running concurrently with
the inferior threads that were not suspended - which
included the main thread of the testcase. */
foreach t in threads do
if t is suspended
ResumeThread t
fi
done
}
If you break at the Sleep call, when we resume, gdb will
have a bit of time to call ResumeThread on the suspended
thread of the testcase. If you instead break at the
ResumeThread line, you'll have a good chance that the
inferior wins the race, hence the "4" result (remember
that ResumeThread returns the previous suspend count).
If we put something like this after the ResumeThread call:
(...)
suspend_count = ResumeThread (h); /* set breakpoint here */
+ Sleep (300);
+ SuspendThread (h);
+ suspend_count = ResumeThread (h);
printf ("%lu\n", suspend_count); /* should be 3 */
(...)
... you'll see that eventually gdb will bring the
suspend count back to 3. (A SuspendThread, ResumeThread
pair is the way to get at the suspend count.)
> Since the watchpoint patch should fix this, what shall I do? Shall I merge
> the two and resubmit, or leave it at that ? They've already been tested
> together without regressions.
>
Here is the merge from the patch I posted at the start of the
thread with this patch:
[win32] Fix watchpoint support
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2007-11/msg00390.html
This patch fixes both the suspend_count
handling, and the watchpoint support.
Thanks Pierre, for looking at it.
OK ?
--
Pedro Alves
[-- Attachment #2: suspend_count_fix_plus_watchpoints.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 5177 bytes --]
2007-11-21 Pedro Alves <pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt>
* win32-nat.c (thread_info_struct): Rename suspend_count to
suspended, to be used as a flag.
(thread_rec): Only suspend the thread if it wasn't suspended by
gdb before. Warn if suspending failed.
(win32_add_thread): Set Dr6 to 0xffff0ff0.
(win32_resume): Likewise.
(win32_continue): Set Dr6 to 0xffff0ff0. Update usage of the
`suspended' flag. Do ContinueDebugEvent after resuming the
suspended threads, not before. Set threads' contexts before
resuming them, not after.
---
gdb/win32-nat.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
Index: src/gdb/win32-nat.c
===================================================================
--- src.orig/gdb/win32-nat.c 2007-11-11 23:13:04.000000000 +0000
+++ src/gdb/win32-nat.c 2007-11-21 22:39:56.000000000 +0000
@@ -112,14 +112,14 @@ static enum target_signal last_sig = TAR
/* Set if a signal was received from the debugged process */
/* Thread information structure used to track information that is
- not available in gdb's thread structure. */
+ not available in gdb's thread structure. */
typedef struct thread_info_struct
{
struct thread_info_struct *next;
DWORD id;
HANDLE h;
char *name;
- int suspend_count;
+ int suspended;
int reload_context;
CONTEXT context;
STACKFRAME sf;
@@ -244,9 +244,10 @@ check (BOOL ok, const char *file, int li
GetLastError ());
}
-/* Find a thread record given a thread id.
- If get_context then also retrieve the context for this
- thread. */
+/* Find a thread record given a thread id passed in ID. If
+ GET_CONTEXT is not 0, then also retrieve the context for this
+ thread. If GET_CONTEXT is negative, then don't suspend the
+ thread. */
static thread_info *
thread_rec (DWORD id, int get_context)
{
@@ -255,12 +256,21 @@ thread_rec (DWORD id, int get_context)
for (th = &thread_head; (th = th->next) != NULL;)
if (th->id == id)
{
- if (!th->suspend_count && get_context)
+ if (!th->suspended && get_context)
{
if (get_context > 0 && id != current_event.dwThreadId)
- th->suspend_count = SuspendThread (th->h) + 1;
+ {
+ if (SuspendThread (th->h) == (DWORD) -1)
+ {
+ DWORD err = GetLastError ();
+ warning (_("SuspendThread failed. (winerr %d)"),
+ (int) err);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ th->suspended = 1;
+ }
else if (get_context < 0)
- th->suspend_count = -1;
+ th->suspended = -1;
th->reload_context = 1;
}
return th;
@@ -294,8 +304,7 @@ win32_add_thread (DWORD id, HANDLE h)
th->context.Dr1 = dr[1];
th->context.Dr2 = dr[2];
th->context.Dr3 = dr[3];
- /* th->context.Dr6 = dr[6];
- FIXME: should we set dr6 also ?? */
+ th->context.Dr6 = 0xffff0ff0;
th->context.Dr7 = dr[7];
CHECK (SetThreadContext (th->h, &th->context));
th->context.ContextFlags = 0;
@@ -1122,32 +1131,34 @@ win32_continue (DWORD continue_status, i
current_event.dwProcessId, current_event.dwThreadId,
continue_status == DBG_CONTINUE ?
"DBG_CONTINUE" : "DBG_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED"));
+
+ for (th = &thread_head; (th = th->next) != NULL;)
+ if ((id == -1 || id == (int) th->id)
+ && th->suspended)
+ {
+ if (debug_registers_changed)
+ {
+ th->context.ContextFlags |= CONTEXT_DEBUG_REGISTERS;
+ th->context.Dr0 = dr[0];
+ th->context.Dr1 = dr[1];
+ th->context.Dr2 = dr[2];
+ th->context.Dr3 = dr[3];
+ th->context.Dr6 = 0xffff0ff0;
+ th->context.Dr7 = dr[7];
+ }
+ if (th->context.ContextFlags)
+ {
+ CHECK (SetThreadContext (th->h, &th->context));
+ th->context.ContextFlags = 0;
+ }
+ if (th->suspended > 0)
+ (void) ResumeThread (th->h);
+ th->suspended = 0;
+ }
+
res = ContinueDebugEvent (current_event.dwProcessId,
current_event.dwThreadId,
continue_status);
- if (res)
- for (th = &thread_head; (th = th->next) != NULL;)
- if (((id == -1) || (id == (int) th->id)) && th->suspend_count)
- {
-
- for (i = 0; i < th->suspend_count; i++)
- (void) ResumeThread (th->h);
- th->suspend_count = 0;
- if (debug_registers_changed)
- {
- /* Only change the value of the debug registers */
- th->context.ContextFlags = CONTEXT_DEBUG_REGISTERS;
- th->context.Dr0 = dr[0];
- th->context.Dr1 = dr[1];
- th->context.Dr2 = dr[2];
- th->context.Dr3 = dr[3];
- /* th->context.Dr6 = dr[6];
- FIXME: should we set dr6 also ?? */
- th->context.Dr7 = dr[7];
- CHECK (SetThreadContext (th->h, &th->context));
- th->context.ContextFlags = 0;
- }
- }
debug_registers_changed = 0;
return res;
@@ -1233,8 +1244,7 @@ win32_resume (ptid_t ptid, int step, enu
th->context.Dr1 = dr[1];
th->context.Dr2 = dr[2];
th->context.Dr3 = dr[3];
- /* th->context.Dr6 = dr[6];
- FIXME: should we set dr6 also ?? */
+ th->context.Dr6 = 0xffff0ff0;
th->context.Dr7 = dr[7];
}
CHECK (SetThreadContext (th->h, &th->context));
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-21 23:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-21 0:35 Pedro Alves
2007-11-21 11:25 ` Pierre Muller
2007-11-21 13:43 ` Pedro Alves
2007-11-21 14:13 ` Pierre Muller
2007-11-21 15:08 ` Pedro Alves
2007-11-21 15:32 ` Pierre Muller
2007-11-21 18:19 ` Pedro Alves
2007-11-21 23:33 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2007-11-22 9:19 ` Pierre Muller
2007-11-23 1:07 ` Christopher Faylor
2007-11-23 10:19 ` Lerele
2007-11-23 18:30 ` Lerele
2007-11-24 12:43 ` Pedro Alves
2007-11-24 14:21 ` Lerele
2007-11-24 5:33 ` Christopher Faylor
2007-11-24 14:18 ` Lerele
2007-11-24 15:49 ` Pedro Alves
2007-11-24 17:50 ` Lerele
2007-11-24 20:49 ` Christopher Faylor
2007-11-24 20:48 ` Christopher Faylor
2007-11-25 14:44 ` Lerele
2007-11-25 18:13 ` Christopher Faylor
2007-11-25 18:56 ` Pedro Alves
2007-11-25 22:05 ` Christopher Faylor
2007-11-25 22:13 ` Lerele
2007-11-25 20:34 ` Lerele
2007-11-24 12:16 ` Pedro Alves
2007-11-24 20:51 ` Christopher Faylor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4744BCCE.60705@portugalmail.pt \
--to=pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox