From: Pedro Alves <pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt>
To: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: For example only, updated Windows DLL support and gdbserver DLL support
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 21:54:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4676FEEC.2010008@portugalmail.pt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070618211213.GA1110@caradoc.them.org>
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 05:07:28PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> I have no objections to this with two exceptions:
>>
>> - You use #ifdef __CYGWIN__ . That would be the only place in the file
>> where that is used. I don't see any reason for this unless your patch
>> is also going to allow native Windows support. If that is the case,
>> then maybe that part should be provided separately.
>>
>> - You seemed to have gratuitously pulled out the code which deals with
>> cygwin exceptions into a separate function. I don't think this has
>> anything to do with solibs and probably shouldn't be part of any
>> final patch.
>
> Pedro, what do you remember about these? At least, I don't _think_ it
> was me...
>
Guilty as charged.
The __CYGWIN__ came from copy/pasting from the gdbserver side of the
patch, where it is needed. It can be easily removed.
The gratuitousness is only apparent. Notice that the
cygwin_load_start/cygwin_load_end calculation moved from the
old solib_symbols_add into that new ignore_access_violation_p
function and now uses the master_so_list () to get at cygwin1.dll.
As I was touching the code, (and I was finding myself reindenting
that big comment, ) I thought of moving it out of handle_exception
to make it cleaner.
Cheers,
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-18 21:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-18 15:08 Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-06-18 21:07 ` Christopher Faylor
2007-06-18 21:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-06-18 21:54 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2007-06-18 23:28 ` Christopher Faylor
2007-06-19 19:06 ` Ulrich Weigand
2007-06-19 19:19 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-06-19 20:00 ` Ulrich Weigand
2007-06-19 20:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-06-19 22:43 ` Pedro Alves
2007-06-19 23:34 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-06-19 23:58 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4676FEEC.2010008@portugalmail.pt \
--to=pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox