Re: For example only, updated Windows DLL support and gdbserver DLL support

[Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@sourceware.org>]

On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 10:53:48PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 05:07:28PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> I have no objections to this with two exceptions:
>>>
>>> - You use #ifdef __CYGWIN__ .  That would be the only place in the file
>>> where that is used.  I don't see any reason for this unless your patch
>>> is also going to allow native Windows support.  If that is the case,
>>> then maybe that part should be provided separately.
>>>
>>> - You seemed to have gratuitously pulled out the code which deals with
>>> cygwin exceptions into a separate function.  I don't think this has
>>> anything to do with solibs and probably shouldn't be part of any
>>> final patch.
>> Pedro, what do you remember about these?  At least, I don't _think_ it
>> was me...
>
> Guilty as charged.
>
> The __CYGWIN__ came from copy/pasting from the gdbserver side of the
> patch, where it is needed.  It can be easily removed.

Ok.

> The gratuitousness is only apparent.  Notice that the
> cygwin_load_start/cygwin_load_end calculation moved from the
> old solib_symbols_add into that new ignore_access_violation_p
> function and now uses the master_so_list () to get at cygwin1.dll.
> As I was touching the code,  (and I was finding myself reindenting
> that big comment, ) I thought of moving it out of handle_exception
> to make it cleaner.

You're right.  I should have looked closer.  It wasn't a gratuitous change
and I agree that moving it into its own function makes sense.

Ship it!

cgf