From: Denis PILAT <denis.pilat@st.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] varobj deletion after the binary has changed
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 17:28:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45B8E8A8.9040904@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45B63A49.4010609@st.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2291 bytes --]
Denis PILAT wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 01:32:22PM +0100, Denis PILAT wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We have a bug in one of our gdb target, when the binary changed
>>> while beeing debugged it appears that some of our varobj refers to
>>> invalid symbols or type.
>>>
>>> I propose a patch that delete all varobj when symbols are reloaded.
>>> May be there is a better place to do that but I think we must do
>>> that somewhere, don't you ?
>>>
>>
>> The right thing to do is probably to figure out where the
>> invalid references come from and fix them - probably by re-evaluating
>> expressions at the next -var-update. Deleting things behind the front
>> end's back is a bad policy.
>>
>>
>>
> Deleting all is a little bit radical, I can understand that.
> Re-evaluating expression would give the expected thing for globale
> variables, but for varobj that has been set on local variable (so
> within a "valid_block"), it should have side effects: the evaluation
> of the expression might tied the varobj to a variable different than
> the one the user originally decided.
>
> I propose to distinguish 2 cases
> - varobj on global variable (valid_block == null) must have their
> expression re-evaluated.
> - other one must be put in a kind of invalid state that will gives
> "in_scope="false" to the user.
> This last point will involve a new field in varobj structure, I
> haven't seen something to mark varobj as invalid.
>
> Denis
>
Hi
Attached is a new patch proposal when I implemented what I explained above.
During the symbol re-loading I invalidate varobjs linked to locals
variable and try to re-evaluate the expression for globals.
No more varobjs are deleted, and during varobj_update invalidated
symbols are skipped so displayed as not in scope.
If you're fine with this implementation I'll write 2 more test cases in
the testsuite that lead to segmentation fault in the current GDB:
- one where the binary file completely changed so any varobjs defined on
global variable are invalidated.
- one where the binary file is just updated so varobjs on globals can
still be evaluated.
I check the testsuite with i386-linux target with no regression and I
passed a valgrind as well.
--
Denis PILAT
STMicroelectronics
[-- Attachment #2: varobj.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3292 bytes --]
Index: symfile.c
===================================================================
--- symfile.c (revision 552)
+++ symfile.c (working copy)
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@
#include "observer.h"
#include "exec.h"
#include "parser-defs.h"
+#include "varobj.h"
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
@@ -2585,6 +2586,10 @@ clear_symtab_users (void)
between expressions and which ought to be reset each time. */
expression_context_block = NULL;
innermost_block = NULL;
+
+ /* Varobj may refer to old symbols, perform a cleanup. */
+ varobj_invalidate ();
+
}
static void
Index: varobj.c
===================================================================
--- varobj.c (revision 552)
+++ varobj.c (working copy)
@@ -77,6 +77,10 @@ struct varobj_root
/* Next root variable */
struct varobj_root *next;
+
+ /* Flag that indicates validity: set to 0 when this varobj_root refers
+ to symbols that do not exist anymore. */
+ int is_valid;
};
/* Every variable in the system has a structure of this type defined
@@ -912,6 +916,9 @@ varobj_update (struct varobj **varp, str
/* Not a root var */
return -1;
+ if (!(*varp)->root->is_valid)
+ return -1;
+
/* Save the selected stack frame, since we will need to change it
in order to evaluate expressions. */
old_fid = get_frame_id (deprecated_selected_frame);
@@ -1361,6 +1368,7 @@ new_root_variable (void)
var->root->frame = null_frame_id;
var->root->use_selected_frame = 0;
var->root->rootvar = NULL;
+ var->root->is_valid = 1;
return var;
}
@@ -2569,3 +2577,45 @@ When non-zero, varobj debugging is enabl
show_varobjdebug,
&setlist, &showlist);
}
+
+/* Invalidate the varobjs that are tied to locals and re-create the ones that
+ are defined on globals.
+ Invalidated varobjs will be always printed in_scope="false". */
+void
+varobj_invalidate (void)
+{
+ struct varobj **all_rootvarobj;
+ struct varobj **varp;
+
+ if (varobj_list (&all_rootvarobj) > 0)
+ {
+ varp = all_rootvarobj;
+ while (*varp != NULL)
+ {
+ /* global var must be re-evaluated. */
+ if ((*varp)->root->valid_block == NULL)
+ {
+ struct varobj *tmp_var;
+
+ /* try to create a varobj with same expression. if success we replace
+ the old varobj, othewize we invalidate it. */
+ tmp_var = varobj_create (NULL, (*varp)->name, (CORE_ADDR) 0, USE_CURRENT_FRAME);
+ if (tmp_var != NULL)
+ {
+ tmp_var->obj_name =
+ savestring ((*varp)->obj_name, strlen ((*varp)->obj_name));
+ varobj_delete (*varp, NULL, 0);
+ install_variable (tmp_var);
+ }
+ else
+ (*varp)->root->is_valid = 0;
+ }
+ else /* locals must be invalidated. */
+ (*varp)->root->is_valid = 0;
+
+ varp++;
+ }
+ xfree (all_rootvarobj);
+ }
+ return;
+}
Index: varobj.h
===================================================================
--- varobj.h (revision 552)
+++ varobj.h (working copy)
@@ -99,4 +99,6 @@ extern int varobj_list (struct varobj **
extern int varobj_update (struct varobj **varp, struct varobj ***changelist);
+extern void varobj_invalidate (void);
+
#endif /* VAROBJ_H */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-25 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-23 12:32 Denis PILAT
2007-01-23 12:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-01-23 12:52 ` Vladimir Prus
2007-01-23 14:49 ` Denis PILAT
2007-01-24 21:49 ` Nick Roberts
2007-01-24 22:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-01-24 22:08 ` Frédéric Riss
2007-01-24 22:18 ` Nick Roberts
2007-01-24 22:52 ` Frédéric Riss
2007-01-24 23:14 ` Nick Roberts
2007-01-25 2:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-01-25 20:50 ` Nick Roberts
2007-01-26 7:25 ` Denis PILAT
2007-01-23 17:20 ` Denis PILAT
2007-01-25 17:28 ` Denis PILAT [this message]
2007-01-25 22:31 ` Nick Roberts
2007-01-25 23:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-01-29 12:39 ` Denis PILAT
2007-01-29 22:12 ` Nick Roberts
2007-01-30 8:49 ` Denis PILAT
2007-01-31 19:07 ` Denis PILAT
2007-01-31 21:29 ` Nick Roberts
2007-02-01 9:49 ` Denis PILAT
2007-02-08 16:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-02-08 19:33 ` Nick Roberts
2007-02-08 19:55 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-02-09 15:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-02-12 21:10 ` Denis PILAT
2007-02-13 0:11 ` Nick Roberts
2007-02-13 8:26 ` Denis PILAT
2007-02-20 16:06 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-02-20 16:17 ` Denis PILAT
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45B8E8A8.9040904@st.com \
--to=denis.pilat@st.com \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox