Re: [RFA]: Watchpoints per thread patch

[Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@redhat.com>]

Jim Blandy wrote:
>>>If you have a fix planned soon regarding the ptid format, I have absolutely 
>>>no objection to waiting for it.  However, if you can't get around to this 
>>>for a while due to other commitments or it is going to take some hashing 
>>>out on the list, let's stop punishing the end-user and do something helpful 
>>>while we work things out proper.
>>
>>Jeff, I've already posted the thread-db change to make this
>>unnecessary.  I was asked to rename the file first, and I've posted
>>that too.
> 
> 
> For those of us trying desperately to keep score, may I ask for a
> recap of Our Story Thus Far?
> 
> - What are the specific pieces of work needed to do this The Right Way?
> - Which have been done already, or at least posted?
> - How long will the rest take?
> - Who has volunteered to do them?
> 
> I'd like to hear Daniel's, Andrew's, and Jeff's answers.
> 
>

Jim,

   I think this is settled now.  I am waiting for Daniel's patch to ptids to be 
posted and accepted.  Then, I will modify my previous patch over top of this.

-- Jeff J.