From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA]: Watchpoints per thread patch
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 20:50:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041109205034.GA8805@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41912D20.6090706@redhat.com>
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 03:48:32PM -0500, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 02:06:07PM -0500, Jeff Johnston wrote:
> >
> >>Time out here for a second. I have been modifying this patch according
> >>to "your" comments. I have had a design that had no observers and one
> >>that kept the observation isolated to the linux code.
> >
> >
> >The design without observers had plenty of other problems, e.g. it also
> >broke remote debugging.
> >
> >My suggestion about putting the observer in add_thread was a bad one.
> >I've never claimed to be an infallible lord of development. A
> >new_thread observer does indeed belong in add_thread, but is not
> >suitable for your use; and I didn't understand why until later.
> >
>
> Fair enough, but it was certainly uncalled for to categorize my patch(s) as
> "crap" as I was attempting to implement your suggested changes.
I think it was entirely called for; it just reflected as much upon my
suggestion as on your patch. I apologize for giving bad advice.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-09 20:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-19 23:57 Jeff Johnston
2004-10-20 5:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-10-20 11:03 ` Mark Kettenis
2004-10-20 16:21 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-10-20 17:27 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-10-20 17:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-10-27 22:36 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-10-27 22:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-10-27 23:17 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-10-28 13:33 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-10-28 19:47 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-10-28 19:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-10-28 20:13 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-10-28 4:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-04 18:25 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-11-04 21:21 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-05 4:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-05 16:52 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-05 18:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-08 21:33 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-09 1:04 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-09 2:20 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-09 2:33 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-09 4:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-09 15:11 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-09 18:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-11 21:22 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-09 19:06 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-11-09 19:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-09 20:24 ` Jim Blandy
2004-11-10 0:02 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-11-10 14:39 ` Jim Blandy
2004-11-11 21:23 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-11-09 20:48 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-11-09 20:50 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2004-11-10 19:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-10 22:08 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-11-10 19:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-10-20 19:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-11-05 11:49 Ulrich Weigand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041109205034.GA8805@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jjohnstn@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox