From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA/testsuite] Some feedback about bigcore.exp...
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:09:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4055D949.7020506@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040312222110.GF1135@gnat.com>
> Hello,
>
> Just FYI, in case others may feel the same way?
>
> We have now run this test pretty much on most of our Unix native
> platforms, and have found that the bigcore.exp testcase is usually quite
> stressful for the host where the testing is being conducted. For
> instance, on sparc-solaris, the system ran out of virtual memory and
> swap space, and started killing processes at random. It also requires a
> very large amount of disk space to be available for the core file (2GB
> on x86-linux). So I was told by other fellow machine users to please
> stop running this test on our build machines.
>
> One thing I would recommend is to delete the core file once the test is
> finished. I had a testsuite run that got ruined because the core file
> filled up all my disk, and left no space available for the rest of the
> run...
>
> 2004-03-12 J. Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
>
> * gdb.base/bigcore.exp: Delete core file after test has completed.
No - it will mean throwing away testsuite information. If a system is
filling disk space with really large core files (as determined by du,
not ls) then that system should have the test disabled -> no sparse core
file support.
Andrew
> Sounds reasonable?
>
> -- Joel
>
>
>
> Index: bigcore.exp
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/bigcore.exp,v
> retrieving revision 1.4
> diff -u -r1.4 bigcore.exp
> --- bigcore.exp 27 Feb 2004 16:48:03 -0000 1.4
> +++ bigcore.exp 12 Mar 2004 22:17:59 -0000
> @@ -190,3 +190,7 @@
>
> check_heap next $next_heap
> check_heap prev $prev_heap
> +
> +# The generated core file uses a large amount of disk-space, so we
> +# delete it now that we're done.
> +remote_exec build "rm -f $corefile"
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA/testsuite] Some feedback about bigcore.exp...
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 16:26:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4055D949.7020506@gnu.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20040315162600.pMtMaqvfjUQ_qNAzpPipPm1zV4V1eP9AN0z2VzMz7qM@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040312222110.GF1135@gnat.com>
> Hello,
>
> Just FYI, in case others may feel the same way?
>
> We have now run this test pretty much on most of our Unix native
> platforms, and have found that the bigcore.exp testcase is usually quite
> stressful for the host where the testing is being conducted. For
> instance, on sparc-solaris, the system ran out of virtual memory and
> swap space, and started killing processes at random. It also requires a
> very large amount of disk space to be available for the core file (2GB
> on x86-linux). So I was told by other fellow machine users to please
> stop running this test on our build machines.
>
> One thing I would recommend is to delete the core file once the test is
> finished. I had a testsuite run that got ruined because the core file
> filled up all my disk, and left no space available for the rest of the
> run...
>
> 2004-03-12 J. Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
>
> * gdb.base/bigcore.exp: Delete core file after test has completed.
No - it will mean throwing away testsuite information. If a system is
filling disk space with really large core files (as determined by du,
not ls) then that system should have the test disabled -> no sparse core
file support.
Andrew
> Sounds reasonable?
>
> -- Joel
>
>
>
> Index: bigcore.exp
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/bigcore.exp,v
> retrieving revision 1.4
> diff -u -r1.4 bigcore.exp
> --- bigcore.exp 27 Feb 2004 16:48:03 -0000 1.4
> +++ bigcore.exp 12 Mar 2004 22:17:59 -0000
> @@ -190,3 +190,7 @@
>
> check_heap next $next_heap
> check_heap prev $prev_heap
> +
> +# The generated core file uses a large amount of disk-space, so we
> +# delete it now that we're done.
> +remote_exec build "rm -f $corefile"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-15 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-19 0:09 Joel Brobecker
2004-03-12 22:21 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-03-19 0:09 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2004-03-15 16:26 ` Andrew Cagney
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-19 0:09 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-03-13 2:08 ` Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-03-19 0:09 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-03-13 4:42 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-03-19 0:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-13 16:58 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4055D949.7020506@gnu.org \
--to=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=brobecker@gnat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox