Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: [RFA/testsuite] Some feedback about bigcore.exp...
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:09:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040312222110.GF1135@gnat.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 962 bytes --]

Hello,

Just FYI, in case others may feel the same way?

We have now run this test pretty much on most of our Unix native
platforms, and have found that the bigcore.exp testcase is usually quite
stressful for the host where the testing is being conducted. For
instance, on sparc-solaris, the system ran out of virtual memory and
swap space, and started killing processes at random. It also requires a
very large amount of disk space to be available for the core file (2GB
on x86-linux). So I was told by other fellow machine users to please
stop running this test on our build machines.

One thing I would recommend is to delete the core file once the test is
finished. I had a testsuite run that got ruined because the core file
filled up all my disk, and left no space available for the rest of the
run...

2004-03-12  J. Brobecker  <brobecker@gnat.com>

        * gdb.base/bigcore.exp: Delete core file after test has completed.

Sounds reasonable?

-- 
Joel

[-- Attachment #2: bigcore.exp --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 506 bytes --]

Index: bigcore.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/bigcore.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.4 bigcore.exp
--- bigcore.exp	27 Feb 2004 16:48:03 -0000	1.4
+++ bigcore.exp	12 Mar 2004 22:17:59 -0000
@@ -190,3 +190,7 @@
 
 check_heap next $next_heap
 check_heap prev $prev_heap
+
+# The generated core file uses a large amount of disk-space, so we
+# delete it now that we're done.
+remote_exec build "rm -f $corefile"

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: [RFA/testsuite] Some feedback about bigcore.exp...
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 22:21:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040312222110.GF1135@gnat.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20040312222100.Z2djUHFXorth44kFFfr4Gi0-3Fcn3GtBMo_IT9o9H6A@z> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 962 bytes --]

Hello,

Just FYI, in case others may feel the same way?

We have now run this test pretty much on most of our Unix native
platforms, and have found that the bigcore.exp testcase is usually quite
stressful for the host where the testing is being conducted. For
instance, on sparc-solaris, the system ran out of virtual memory and
swap space, and started killing processes at random. It also requires a
very large amount of disk space to be available for the core file (2GB
on x86-linux). So I was told by other fellow machine users to please
stop running this test on our build machines.

One thing I would recommend is to delete the core file once the test is
finished. I had a testsuite run that got ruined because the core file
filled up all my disk, and left no space available for the rest of the
run...

2004-03-12  J. Brobecker  <brobecker@gnat.com>

        * gdb.base/bigcore.exp: Delete core file after test has completed.

Sounds reasonable?

-- 
Joel

[-- Attachment #2: bigcore.exp --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 506 bytes --]

Index: bigcore.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/bigcore.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.4 bigcore.exp
--- bigcore.exp	27 Feb 2004 16:48:03 -0000	1.4
+++ bigcore.exp	12 Mar 2004 22:17:59 -0000
@@ -190,3 +190,7 @@
 
 check_heap next $next_heap
 check_heap prev $prev_heap
+
+# The generated core file uses a large amount of disk-space, so we
+# delete it now that we're done.
+remote_exec build "rm -f $corefile"

             reply	other threads:[~2004-03-12 22:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-19  0:09 Joel Brobecker [this message]
2004-03-12 22:21 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-03-19  0:09 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-15 16:26   ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-19  0:09 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-03-13  2:08 ` Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-03-19  0:09 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-03-13  4:42   ` Joel Brobecker
2004-03-19  0:09   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-13 16:58     ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040312222110.GF1135@gnat.com \
    --to=brobecker@gnat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox