Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA/testsuite] Some feedback about bigcore.exp...
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 16:26:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4055D949.7020506@gnu.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20040315162600.pMtMaqvfjUQ_qNAzpPipPm1zV4V1eP9AN0z2VzMz7qM@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040312222110.GF1135@gnat.com>

> Hello,
> 
> Just FYI, in case others may feel the same way?
> 
> We have now run this test pretty much on most of our Unix native
> platforms, and have found that the bigcore.exp testcase is usually quite
> stressful for the host where the testing is being conducted. For
> instance, on sparc-solaris, the system ran out of virtual memory and
> swap space, and started killing processes at random. It also requires a
> very large amount of disk space to be available for the core file (2GB
> on x86-linux). So I was told by other fellow machine users to please
> stop running this test on our build machines.
> 
> One thing I would recommend is to delete the core file once the test is
> finished. I had a testsuite run that got ruined because the core file
> filled up all my disk, and left no space available for the rest of the
> run...
> 
> 2004-03-12  J. Brobecker  <brobecker@gnat.com>
> 
>         * gdb.base/bigcore.exp: Delete core file after test has completed.

No - it will mean throwing away testsuite information.  If a system is 
filling disk space with really large core files (as determined by du, 
not ls) then that system should have the test disabled -> no sparse core 
file support.

Andrew


> Sounds reasonable?
> 
> -- Joel
> 
> 
> 
> Index: bigcore.exp
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/bigcore.exp,v
> retrieving revision 1.4
> diff -u -r1.4 bigcore.exp
> --- bigcore.exp	27 Feb 2004 16:48:03 -0000	1.4
> +++ bigcore.exp	12 Mar 2004 22:17:59 -0000
> @@ -190,3 +190,7 @@
>  
>  check_heap next $next_heap
>  check_heap prev $prev_heap
> +
> +# The generated core file uses a large amount of disk-space, so we
> +# delete it now that we're done.
> +remote_exec build "rm -f $corefile"


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-03-15 16:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-19  0:09 Joel Brobecker
2004-03-12 22:21 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-03-19  0:09 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2004-03-15 16:26   ` Andrew Cagney
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-19  0:09 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-03-13  2:08 ` Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-03-19  0:09 ` Joel Brobecker
2004-03-13  4:42   ` Joel Brobecker
2004-03-19  0:09   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-13 16:58     ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4055D949.7020506@gnu.org \
    --to=cagney@gnu.org \
    --cc=brobecker@gnat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox