From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>,
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, rearnsha@arm.com
Subject: Re: RFA/ARM: Switch mode when setting PC
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 19:12:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40083792.7020102@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200401161727.i0GHRxt24387@pc960.cambridge.arm.com>
> For example, if the user writes a 32-bit value into the PC, the CPSR state
>> > probably shouldn't be changed (even if the bottom bit is altered) -- this
>> > is how ARM's debuggers behave. However, if the user 'calls' a function
>> > that is in the 'other state', then the CPSR should be updated (and
>> > presumably restored afterwards).
>> >
>> > I'm not sure if GDB has a way of separating these two cases. It's an
>> > interesting problem.
>
>>
>> I believe that this will work at present, because setting $pc will not
>> go through write_pc. There's some blind luck involved in this, though.
Or a lack of design, Arm needs to ensure that it doesn't define PC_REGNUM.
> In the past we've tried to distinguish R15 from PC. This was especially
> useful in the legacy 26-bit mode where the CPSR bits *were* in R15.
>
> This would probably all have been much simpler if I'd been able to
> complete my code for handling the banked register; sadly I never got far
> enough, and I think the code is probably too bit-rotten to be worth trying
> to resurrect directly at this point.
If there's an explicit "set_resume_address", separate to write_pc, this
should happen:
(gdb) set $r15 = 0x123
- target sees:
$r15=0x123
(gdb) call foo() OR (gdb) jump foo
- target, via "set_resume_address", sees:
$r15=&foo
$ps&|=<magic-bits>
and significantly no other write_pc calls.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-16 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-16 3:54 Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-01-16 5:43 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-01-16 14:10 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-01-16 14:15 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-01-16 14:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-01-16 14:34 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-01-16 14:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-01-16 15:00 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-01-16 15:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-01-16 16:55 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-01-16 17:11 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-01-16 17:28 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-01-16 19:12 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2004-01-16 17:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-01-16 18:57 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-01-17 4:58 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-01-17 10:49 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-01-17 16:36 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-01-17 16:12 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-01-17 18:54 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-01-17 21:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40083792.7020102@gnu.org \
--to=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=rearnsha@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox