From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: RFA/ARM: Switch mode when setting PC
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 17:32:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040116173235.GA7498@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040116141040.GA8134@nevyn.them.org>
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 09:10:40AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > The ari contains this yellow card:
> >
> > write pc
> > Replace write_pc() with get_frame_base_address or get_frame_id; at
> > present the inferior function call code still uses this when doing a
> > DECR_PC_AFTER_BREAK
> >
> > the concern is with the way write_pc is being called to perform two
> > different operations:
> >
> > - decrement the pc just after the target stops
> > Arrrg!
> > - jump to a specific address
> > As with an inferior function call or jump.
> >
> > I think it would be better to have two methods so that it's clear that
> > this case only applies when doing a jump.
>
> Well, it'd be better to rip out the current DECR_PC_AFTER_BREAK and
> handle it completely within the four (roughly) affected targets,
> thereby removing the overloading of write_pc. IMVHO.
Hi Andrew,
Is this patch OK (write_pc isn't deprecated yet!)? Cleaning up the
existing DECR_PC_AFTER_BREAK handling is going to be a touchy job, and
I don't really want to try it today :) I'll try to look into it later,
though.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-16 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-16 3:54 Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-01-16 5:43 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-01-16 14:10 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-01-16 14:15 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-01-16 14:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-01-16 14:34 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-01-16 14:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-01-16 15:00 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-01-16 15:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-01-16 16:55 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-01-16 17:11 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-01-16 17:28 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-01-16 19:12 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-01-16 17:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2004-01-16 18:57 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-01-17 4:58 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-01-17 10:49 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-01-17 16:36 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-01-17 16:12 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-01-17 18:54 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-01-17 21:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040116173235.GA7498@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=cagney@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox