From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: unwind support for Linux 2.6 vsyscall DSO
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 04:17:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F823E3B.4070005@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031007040754.GA32257@nevyn.them.org>
> So I can see either an iterator, or an update to to_query being added to
>> the target vector. Given that the iterator is a given, that might be
>> the safest starting point - let the target maintainer go through and
>> clean up to_query.
>
>
> While I won't argue about an iterator being useful, I think that the
> target vector code would be clearer if we just had the raw buffer.
> Layer the iterator on top of it, instead of re-implementing the
> iterator in every target.
Each target won't implement the iterator. Rather it will call on a
generic unpack method, and have that it do it.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-07 4:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-03 8:27 Roland McGrath
2003-10-03 23:44 ` Jim Blandy
2003-10-04 0:10 ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-04 7:28 ` Jim Blandy
2003-10-04 20:27 ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-04 21:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-04 22:01 ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-04 23:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-06 17:14 ` Jim Blandy
2003-10-06 19:35 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-10-06 19:31 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-10-06 20:24 ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-06 21:48 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-10-06 23:59 ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-07 0:13 ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-07 2:30 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-10-07 2:40 ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-07 2:47 ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-07 3:53 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-10-07 4:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-07 4:17 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2003-10-07 4:28 ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-08 0:02 ` Michael Snyder
2003-10-08 0:46 ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-08 18:27 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-10-08 21:00 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-10-08 21:47 ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-08 23:25 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-10-09 0:45 ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-08 23:10 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-10-09 0:50 ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-08 23:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-07 0:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-07 23:54 ` Michael Snyder
2003-10-08 0:07 ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-07 4:43 ` Jim Blandy
2003-10-07 4:45 ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-09 19:58 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-10-09 20:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-09 20:10 ` Jim Blandy
2003-10-09 22:20 ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-09 22:49 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-10-10 0:12 ` Michael Snyder
2003-10-11 1:44 ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-09 23:04 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-10-11 1:47 ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-15 4:33 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-10-09 20:21 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-10-09 20:23 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-09 20:46 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-10-09 22:32 ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-09 22:46 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-10-11 1:40 ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-09 22:07 ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-09 22:32 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-10-07 3:33 Roland McGrath
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F823E3B.4070005@redhat.com \
--to=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox