Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
To: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: unwind support for Linux 2.6 vsyscall DSO
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 02:40:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200310070240.h972eBoX011939@magilla.sf.frob.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Elena Zannoni's message of  Monday, 6 October 2003 22:41:30 -0400 <16258.10202.899788.703135@localhost.redhat.com>

> It is useful if you want to apply a specific function to the entries
> of the auxv vectors in a generic way while iterating. There are plenty
> of other examples in gdb and bfd where this interface is used, albeit
> it may not be the most efficient. I think you could still write an
> iterator because it will be needed.

I understand.  I would prefer a block-reading interface in the target
vector (e.g. something similar to target_read_aux_vector as in the patch I
posted) and a utility function that is an iterator applied to the block.
Do you see a problem with that?  Or do you think that the conversion from
target width and byte order to host format and back is desireable in some
way?  I don't feel strongly about this.


  reply	other threads:[~2003-10-07  2:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-03  8:27 Roland McGrath
2003-10-03 23:44 ` Jim Blandy
2003-10-04  0:10   ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-04  7:28     ` Jim Blandy
2003-10-04 20:27       ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-04 21:14         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-04 22:01           ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-04 23:28             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-06 17:14         ` Jim Blandy
2003-10-06 19:35       ` Elena Zannoni
2003-10-06 19:31 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-10-06 20:24   ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-06 21:48     ` Elena Zannoni
2003-10-06 23:59       ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-07  0:13         ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-07  2:30           ` Elena Zannoni
2003-10-07  2:40             ` Roland McGrath [this message]
2003-10-07  2:47               ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-07  3:53           ` Andrew Cagney
2003-10-07  4:07             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-07  4:17               ` Andrew Cagney
2003-10-07  4:28             ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-08  0:02               ` Michael Snyder
2003-10-08  0:46                 ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-08 18:27                   ` Andrew Cagney
2003-10-08 21:00               ` Andrew Cagney
2003-10-08 21:47                 ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-08 23:25                   ` Elena Zannoni
2003-10-09  0:45                     ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-08 23:10                 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-10-09  0:50                   ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-08 23:53                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-07  0:17         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-07 23:54         ` Michael Snyder
2003-10-08  0:07           ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-07  4:43     ` Jim Blandy
2003-10-07  4:45       ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-09 19:58         ` Kevin Buettner
2003-10-09 20:02           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-09 20:10             ` Jim Blandy
2003-10-09 22:20               ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-09 22:49                 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-10-10  0:12                   ` Michael Snyder
2003-10-11  1:44                   ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-09 23:04                 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-10-11  1:47                   ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-15  4:33                     ` Kevin Buettner
2003-10-09 20:21             ` Kevin Buettner
2003-10-09 20:23               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-09 20:46                 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-10-09 22:32                   ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-09 22:46                     ` Kevin Buettner
2003-10-11  1:40                       ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-09 22:07           ` Roland McGrath
2003-10-09 22:32             ` Kevin Buettner
2003-10-07  3:33 Roland McGrath

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200310070240.h972eBoX011939@magilla.sf.frob.com \
    --to=roland@redhat.com \
    --cc=ezannoni@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox