From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: Kei Sakamoto <sakamoto.kei@renesas.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch/testcase] gdb.asm/m32r.inc: fix compile error
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 04:17:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F31D2D4.4070807@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030805180235.GA30002@nevyn.them.org>
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 03:26:03PM +0900, Kei Sakamoto wrote:
>
>> Thank you, everyone. Now m32r is back! :-)
>>
>> The attached fixes compile errors of asm-source.exp for m32r-elf.
>> There are several missing symbols.
>>
>> It also replaces ld24 instruction with seth/add3 instruction.
>> ld24 can handle only 24bit address, so ld24 fails to set sp when
>> _stack is located at a large address.
>>
>> Kei Sakamoto
>>
>> ===
>>
>> 2003-08-04 Kei Sakamoto <sakamoto.kei@renesas.com>
>>
>> * gdb.asm/m32r.inc : Add several missing symbols. Replace ld24
>> with seth/add3.
>
>
> Two minor things:
> - You accidentally sent a reversed diff.
> - ChangeLog formatting. It should be:
>
> 2003-08-04 Kei Sakamoto <sakamoto.kei@renesas.com>
>
> * gdb.asm/m32r.inc: Add several missing symbols. Replace ld24
> with seth/add3.
>
> One less minor thing: no other port needs to declare symbols. It looks
> like part of libc is being dragged in somehow on m32r; could you
> explain why the symbols are necessary?
This, I suspect is a hangover from an historic foobar that no ones gone
back to fix. The original assembler tests used AS and LD making for a
very raw test framework. It was an intentional decision, very like the
simulator tests, rely on an absolute minimum to get things working.
Unfortunatly, sometime back a change switched LD to GCC but at the time
no one realised (or those reviewing remembered gdb.asm's intent).
Anyway, it needs to be switched back and that isn't going to be pleasant ...
Andrew
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-07 4:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-04 6:22 Kei Sakamoto
2003-08-05 18:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-06 1:45 ` Kei Sakamoto
2003-08-06 6:08 ` Doug Evans
2003-08-06 13:04 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-07 2:20 ` Kei Sakamoto
2003-08-07 4:06 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-07 4:17 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F31D2D4.4070807@redhat.com \
--to=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=sakamoto.kei@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox