From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, nick@nick.uklinux.net, bob_rossi@cox.net
Subject: Re: [rfc] Annotation level THREE
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 19:04:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E6F84C7.8070409@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ro1k7f4mn67.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>
> On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 18:37:10 -0500, Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> said:
>
>
>> With this and its doco in, I think 5.4 is clear to go (or at least try to).
>
>
> So what's the timetable for the branch and the release, exactly? It
> seems like we've suddenly switched to a much more hurried mode; should
> the 5.4 branch be cut immediately, even before the annotation level
> three change gets put in, so that we can avoid putting changes that
> might inadvertently be destabilizing on the branch? (Obviously the
> annotation level 3 change would get added to the branch, as well as
> bugfixes.)
See: http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/schedule/. `soon'.
We've been in a more hurried mode since January.
Should you delay your changes? No.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-12 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-11 23:37 Andrew Cagney
2003-03-12 18:54 ` David Carlton
2003-03-12 19:04 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2003-03-14 0:08 ` Nick Roberts
2003-03-17 0:23 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-03-17 20:07 ` Nick Roberts
2003-03-17 20:38 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-03-18 10:31 ` Nick Roberts
2003-03-18 15:29 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-03-18 16:00 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-03-18 20:17 ` Bob Rossi
2003-03-12 6:09 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-03-12 14:50 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-03-12 14:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-03-12 17:04 ` David Carlton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E6F84C7.8070409@redhat.com \
--to=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=bob_rossi@cox.net \
--cc=carlton@math.stanford.edu \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=nick@nick.uklinux.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox