From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>,
bob_rossi@cox.net, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com,
nick@nick.uklinux.net
Subject: Re: [rfc] Annotation level THREE
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 14:56:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030312145601.GA2636@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E6F491A.4050401@redhat.com>
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 09:50:02AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >Hi Andrew,
> >
> >
> >>With this and its doco in, I think 5.4 is clear to go (or at least try
> >>to).
> >
> >
> >The last time I looked in detail was 2003-02-16:
> >
> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2003-02/msg00257.html
> >
> >At that time, there were still several high priority PR's about build
> >issues; x86-64 regresions; and java fails the 'break main' test.
> >
> >Do you care about any of these things?
>
> `or at least try to'. As far as I know this is the only feature that
> could block the next release. It's critical that a GDB release
> containing this be made soon.
>
> - x86-64 was always broken
Eh, I believe that x86-64 worked in GDB 5.3, judging from Michal's
comments.
> - java improvements would be nice
>
> A real concern is that `long long' regression.
It's down the road behind my currently pending DWARF-2 patch.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-12 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-12 6:09 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-03-12 14:50 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-03-12 14:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2003-03-12 17:04 ` David Carlton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-11 23:37 Andrew Cagney
2003-03-12 18:54 ` David Carlton
2003-03-12 19:04 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-03-14 0:08 ` Nick Roberts
2003-03-17 0:23 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-03-17 20:07 ` Nick Roberts
2003-03-17 20:38 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-03-18 10:31 ` Nick Roberts
2003-03-18 15:29 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-03-18 16:00 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-03-18 20:17 ` Bob Rossi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030312145601.GA2636@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=bob_rossi@cox.net \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=mec@shout.net \
--cc=nick@nick.uklinux.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox