From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18550 invoked by alias); 12 Mar 2003 19:04:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18529 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2003 19:04:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (172.16.49.200) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 12 Mar 2003 19:04:39 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23C7A2B11; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 14:04:40 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3E6F84C7.8070409@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 19:04:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030223 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Carlton Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, nick@nick.uklinux.net, bob_rossi@cox.net Subject: Re: [rfc] Annotation level THREE References: <3E6E7326.3020906@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00283.txt.bz2 > On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 18:37:10 -0500, Andrew Cagney said: > > >> With this and its doco in, I think 5.4 is clear to go (or at least try to). > > > So what's the timetable for the branch and the release, exactly? It > seems like we've suddenly switched to a much more hurried mode; should > the 5.4 branch be cut immediately, even before the annotation level > three change gets put in, so that we can avoid putting changes that > might inadvertently be destabilizing on the branch? (Obviously the > annotation level 3 change would get added to the branch, as well as > bugfixes.) See: http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/schedule/. `soon'. We've been in a more hurried mode since January. Should you delay your changes? No. Andrew