Re: Recent MI patches broke the testsuite

["J. Johnston" <jjohnstn@redhat.com>]

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 01:24:28PM -0500, Elena Zannoni wrote:
> 
>>J. Johnston writes:
>> > My bad.  :(  The new mi-basics.exp testcase is my usual sanity test
>> > for this change.  It was updated and in fact works fine as it is expecting
>> > the new behavior.
>> > 
>> > I did not look at the correct gdb.log for the full mi testsuite.
>> > As you have noted, the lib/mi-support.exp routine mi_reinitialize_dir
>> > is using -environment-directory and is expecting the old output.
>> > 
>> > I have a patch for lib/mi=support.exp to handle the new syntax which I have
>> > included.  Since I require approval for patches I will revert the
>> > original patch and resubmit with the added change unless Elena says
>> > otherwise.
>> > 
>>
>>If this patch fixes the testsuite, no need to revert the other one,
>>just check this in. Don't forget the ChangeLog.
>>
>>Maybe Daniel can verify that it fixes his problem?
> 
> 
> Yes, it does, except for the mi-basics.exp part.  And that's minor.
> 

Great.  I have checked in the patch from the previous note.  I will
look into making the mi-basics.exp test more robust with regards
to relative paths without overly abusing .*.

-- Jeff J.