From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: shebs@apple.com, drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: which patches to review
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 07:32:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CC8137D.6050809@cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020424.103856.00478620.davem@redhat.com>
> From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
> Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 13:15:57 -0400
>
> Here, you're mistaken.
>
> He isn't %100 wrong. I've been asked repeatedly to basically
> multi-arch the Sparc targets out the wazoo to get the Linux
> Sparc bits in.
One of GDB's overriding objectives it to get everything multi-arch. To
that end:
Post 5.0, every new architecture has to be mult-arched
Post 5.1, every addition to an existing architecture has to be mult-arch
enabled
As acceptence criteria, they are simple and transparent. I don't think
me stiching up some sort of cosy deal where you were some how excempted
from this would go down very well :-)
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-25 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-22 22:49 David S. Miller
2002-04-23 7:47 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-04-23 7:54 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-23 22:19 ` David S. Miller
2002-04-24 8:53 ` Stan Shebs
2002-04-24 10:16 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-24 10:48 ` David S. Miller
2002-04-24 12:16 ` Kevin Buettner
2002-04-24 12:25 ` David S. Miller
2002-04-25 7:04 ` Andrew Cagney
[not found] ` <mailpost.1019743470.13502@news-sj1-1>
2002-04-25 9:19 ` cgd
2002-04-25 7:32 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2002-04-25 18:04 ` David S. Miller
2002-04-25 20:27 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-25 18:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-25 18:36 ` Christopher Faylor
2002-04-25 18:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-25 19:17 ` Christopher Faylor
2002-04-25 20:33 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-26 9:26 ` Stan Shebs
2002-04-25 20:17 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-25 22:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3CC8137D.6050809@cygnus.com \
--to=ac131313@cygnus.com \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=shebs@apple.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox