Re: which patches to review

[Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 09:45:51PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>>Hmm.  I was under the impression that 1) Andrew was the head maintainer
>>for gdb
>
>If so, this isn't said anywhere.  It certainly may be true; all I know
>is that he's a blanket write maintainer and the release manager for the
>last several releases.  If the GDB projects has a single head
>maintainer, perhaps that should be listed in gdb/MAINTAINERS somewhere?

It's true.  Maybe "head maintainer" is the wrong word.  I don't know what
the correct PC term is.

You're correct, however, in saying that this isn't mentioned anywhere
obvious.  I agree that should be corrected.

Maybe we should make a new hard rule that no further changes to
MAINTAINERS will be accepted until this oversight is corrected.  :-)

>I'm going to shut up now; I've no desire for a protacted argument and
>I've foolishly walked into the middle of one.

Ditto on both counts.

cgf