From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>, ac131313@cygnus.com
Cc: shebs@apple.com, drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: which patches to review
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 12:16:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1020424191644.ZM15056@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> "Re: which patches to review" (Apr 24, 10:38am)
On Apr 24, 10:38am, David S. Miller wrote:
> Right now all of the Sparc Linux bits are in a pending state because
> they need to be sequenced after the multi-arch bits. Currently, this
> one is holding up sparc-linux-tdep from being added:
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-04/msg00710.html
I just took a quick look at this one and I think it's okay. I was
going to complain about the fact this...
+#if (GDB_TARGET_IS_SPARC64)
+#define FP_MAX_REGNUM (FP0_REGNUM + 48)
+#else
+#define FP_MAX_REGNUM (FP0_REGNUM + 32)
+#endif
...appears in the new sparc-tdep.h, but then I realized that this was
simply moved over verbatim from sparc-tdep.c. It seems reasonable to
me that this could/should be cleaned up in a later patch.
Anyway, I recommend that David's lynch-pin patch be approved.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-24 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-22 22:49 David S. Miller
2002-04-23 7:47 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-04-23 7:54 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-23 22:19 ` David S. Miller
2002-04-24 8:53 ` Stan Shebs
2002-04-24 10:16 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-24 10:48 ` David S. Miller
2002-04-24 12:16 ` Kevin Buettner [this message]
2002-04-24 12:25 ` David S. Miller
2002-04-25 7:04 ` Andrew Cagney
[not found] ` <mailpost.1019743470.13502@news-sj1-1>
2002-04-25 9:19 ` cgd
2002-04-25 7:32 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-25 18:04 ` David S. Miller
2002-04-25 20:27 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-25 18:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-25 18:36 ` Christopher Faylor
2002-04-25 18:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-25 19:17 ` Christopher Faylor
2002-04-25 20:33 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-26 9:26 ` Stan Shebs
2002-04-25 20:17 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-25 22:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1020424191644.ZM15056@localhost.localdomain \
--to=kevinb@redhat.com \
--cc=ac131313@cygnus.com \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=shebs@apple.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox